Freya Vanir vs Loki Divine Mark: which needs more amplifier?

The Kinera Freya Vanir is 16Ω at 88.0 dB/mW; the Kinera Loki Divine Mark is 14Ω at 105.0 dB (no reference unit printed). This page covers what they ask of an amplifier, not how they sound.

The Freya Vanir needs 17.0 dB more than the Loki Divine Mark to reach the same loudness — 16 mW against 0.32 mW.

The numbers that decide it

SpecificationFreya VanirLoki Divine Mark
Impedance16 Ω14 Ω
Sensitivity88.0 dB/mW105.0 dB
Sensitivity (voltage)106.0 dB/V123.5 dB/V
Power for 100 dB16 mW0.32 mW
Voltage for 100 dB0.50 V67 mV
Current for 100 dB31.5 mA4.8 mA
Highest source impedance
that leaves them alone (one-eighth rule)
2.00 Ω1.75 Ω
Sources that reach 100 dB
out of 280
262280

One caution before reading the rows. Kinera Loki Divine Mark printed a decibel figure with no reference unit, so this page reads it as per milliwatt. If it is really per volt, that model needs far more than the table says. Why the two readings differ by so much.

Where the two part company

18 of the 280 sources have the power for the Loki Divine Mark but not for the Freya Vanir — Apple USB-C dongle (US), Apple USB-C dongle (EU), JadeAudio JA11, 15 more.

4 sources are low enough in output impedance for the Freya Vanir under the one-eighth rule but not for the Loki Divine Mark (Schiit Vali 2+, Astell&Kern HC3, RME Fireface UFX II, 1 more).

5 sources stay below the audible-hiss threshold with the Freya Vanir but cross it with the Loki Divine Mark (FiiO BTR11, FiiO K11 R2R, Lake People G111 Mk II, 2 more).

262 of the 280 sources here reach 100 dB on both.

What each one needs from 80 to 105 dB

The Freya Vanir is more demanding than 87% of the 567 non-electrostatic models in this database; the Loki Divine Mark than 20%.

dB SPLFreya Vanir powerFreya Vanir voltageLoki Divine Mark powerLoki Divine Mark voltage
800.16 mW50 mV3.2 µW7 mV
850.50 mW90 mV0.01 mW12 mV
901.6 mW0.16 V0.03 mW21 mV
955.0 mW0.28 V0.10 mW37 mV
10016 mW0.50 V0.32 mW67 mV
10550 mW0.90 V1.0 mW0.12 V

The cheapest source that satisfies both

SourcePriceHeadroom, Freya VanirHeadroom, Loki Divine MarkOutput impedanceNoise
FiiO KA11$2911.9 dB28.3 dB0.7 Ω1.7 µV
FiiO BTR13$598.8 dB25.2 dB0.6 Ω1.0 µV
iBasso DC03 Pro$694.9 dB21.3 dB0.12 Ω0.9 µV

Of the 280 sources here, 262 reach 100 dB on both. 64 of them also publish an output impedance low enough for both under the one-eighth rule and a noise figure that stays below the audible-hiss threshold with both.

The cheapest of the 64 is the FiiO KA11, at $29. It leaves 11.9 dB of headroom on the Freya Vanir and 28.3 dB on the Loki Divine Mark, its output impedance is 0.7 Ω against a one-eighth limit of 2.00 Ω and 1.75 Ω, and its noise figure puts the hiss floor 29 dB and 12 dB below the 20 dB SPL this site treats as the point where a quiet room stops hiding it.

Try any other source.

What each sheet prints, and what it is worth

ModelAs printedToleranceStandard
Freya Vanir20Hz – 20kHznot printednot printed
Loki Divine Mark20Hz - 50kHz ultra-widebandnot printednot printed

Kinera prints 20Hz – 20kHz for the Freya Vanir and 20Hz - 50kHz ultra-wideband for the Loki Divine Mark.

Loki Divine Mark: Kinera prints “ultra-wideband” inside the specification cell, next to the numbers and in place of the tolerance that would have said what the range means.

Neither range has a tolerance printed beside it, so a wider range on one sheet is not deeper bass or more treble.

Not a measurement; maker by maker.

Both pages in full

Both have a page of their own. In full: Kinera Freya Vanir and Kinera Loki Divine Mark. Each figure on this page is labelled on those pages with where it came from, including the ones Kinera never published — what that maker publishes, counted.

↑