AEON RT vs Ether C Flow 1.1: which needs more amplifier?

The Dan Clark Audio AEON RT is 13Ω at 90.0 dB/mW; the Dan Clark Audio Ether C Flow 1.1 is 23Ω at 94.0 dB (no figure from the maker at all). This page is only about what they ask of an amplifier — not how they sound, which no specification on either sheet can tell you.

The AEON RT needs 4.0 dB more than the Ether C Flow 1.1 to reach the same loudness — 10 mW against 4.0 mW.

The numbers that decide it

SpecificationAEON RTEther C Flow 1.1
Impedance13 Ω23 Ω
Sensitivity90.0 dB/mW94.0 dB
Sensitivity (voltage)108.9 dB/V110.4 dB/V
Power for 100 dB10 mW4.0 mW
Voltage for 100 dB0.36 V0.30 V
Current for 100 dB27.7 mA13.2 mA
Highest source impedance
that leaves them alone (one-eighth rule)
1.62 Ω2.88 Ω
Sources that reach 100 dB
out of 280
272280

One caution before reading the rows. For Dan Clark Audio Ether C Flow 1.1 the maker publishes no sensitivity figure at all. The number in the table was collected when this database was first built and has never been traced to a manufacturer document, so treat every row below it as an estimate rather than a specification.

Where the two part company

8 of the 280 sources have the power for the Ether C Flow 1.1 but not for the AEON RT — Apple USB-C dongle (EU), Zoom AMS-22, Audient EVO 4, 5 more.

5 sources are low enough in output impedance for the Ether C Flow 1.1 under the one-eighth rule but not for the AEON RT (FiiO KA13, Schiit Vali 2+, Astell&Kern HC3, 2 more).

272 of the 280 sources here reach 100 dB on both. That count is about power only — the output-impedance and hiss lines above are separate questions, and a source can pass this one and fail those.

Both pages in full

Each model has a page of its own with the full source list, the hiss estimate and the provenance of every figure above: Dan Clark Audio AEON RT and Dan Clark Audio Ether C Flow 1.1. Each figure on this page is labelled on those pages with where it came from, including the ones Dan Clark Audio never published — what that maker publishes, counted.