MK12 x DucBloke vs MP143 Salt: which needs more amplifier?

The Hidizs MK12 x DucBloke is 32Ω at 111.0 dB (no reference unit printed); the Hidizs MP143 Salt is 17Ω at 103.0 dB (no reference unit printed). This page covers what they ask of an amplifier, not how they sound.

The MP143 Salt needs 8.0 dB more than the MK12 x DucBloke to reach the same loudness — 0.50 mW against 0.08 mW.

The numbers that decide it

SpecificationMK12 x DucBlokeMP143 Salt
Impedance32 Ω17 Ω
Sensitivity111.0 dB103.0 dB
Sensitivity (voltage)125.9 dB/V120.7 dB/V
Power for 100 dB0.08 mW0.50 mW
Voltage for 100 dB50 mV92 mV
Current for 100 dB1.6 mA5.4 mA
Highest source impedance
that leaves them alone (one-eighth rule)
4.00 Ω2.12 Ω
Sources that reach 100 dB
out of 280
280280

One caution before reading the rows. Hidizs MK12 x DucBloke and Hidizs MP143 Salt printed a decibel figure with no reference unit, so this page reads it as per milliwatt. If it is really per volt, each of them needs far more than the table says. Why the two readings differ by so much.

Where the two part company

Every source in the database that drives one of them drives the other. On power, the choice between these two changes nothing about what amplifier you need.

14 sources stay below the audible-hiss threshold with the MP143 Salt but cross it with the MK12 x DucBloke (FiiO BTR11, FiiO K11 R2R, Lake People G103-S Mk II, 11 more).

280 of the 280 sources here reach 100 dB on both.

What each one needs from 80 to 105 dB

The MP143 Salt is more demanding than 30% of the 567 non-electrostatic models in this database; the MK12 x DucBloke than 12%.

dB SPLMK12 x DucBloke powerMK12 x DucBloke voltageMP143 Salt powerMP143 Salt voltage
800.8 µW5 mV5.0 µW9 mV
852.5 µW9 mV0.02 mW16 mV
907.9 µW16 mV0.05 mW29 mV
950.03 mW28 mV0.16 mW52 mV
1000.08 mW50 mV0.50 mW92 mV
1050.25 mW90 mV1.6 mW0.16 V

The cheapest source that satisfies both

SourcePriceHeadroom, MK12 x DucBlokeHeadroom, MP143 SaltOutput impedanceNoise
JadeAudio JA11$2025.8 dB15.0 dB0.5 Ω1.7 µV
FiiO KA11$2934.0 dB26.8 dB0.7 Ω1.7 µV
FiiO BTR13$5931.0 dB23.7 dB0.6 Ω1.0 µV

Of the 280 sources here, 280 reach 100 dB on both. 57 of them also publish an output impedance low enough for both under the one-eighth rule and a noise figure that stays below the audible-hiss threshold with both.

The cheapest of the 57 is the JadeAudio JA11, at $20. It leaves 25.8 dB of headroom on the MK12 x DucBloke and 15.0 dB on the MP143 Salt, its output impedance is 0.5 Ω against a one-eighth limit of 4.00 Ω and 2.12 Ω, and its noise figure puts the hiss floor 9 dB and 15 dB below the 20 dB SPL this site treats as the point where a quiet room stops hiding it.

Try any other source.

What each sheet prints, and what it is worth

ModelAs printedToleranceStandard
MK12 x DucBloke10Hz-45kHznot printednot printed
MP143 Salt20Hz to 40kHznot printednot printed

Hidizs prints 10Hz-45kHz for the MK12 x DucBloke and 20Hz to 40kHz for the MP143 Salt.

For both: Hidizs prints this figure in the body copy of the product page. The only specification table on that page belongs to a different product — one of the company’s DAC dongles — and there is no frequency row in a table for this model.

Neither range has a tolerance printed beside it, so a wider range on one sheet is not deeper bass or more treble.

Not a measurement; maker by maker.

Both pages in full

Both have a page of their own. In full: Hidizs MK12 x DucBloke and Hidizs MP143 Salt. Each figure on this page is labelled on those pages with where it came from, including the ones Hidizs never published — what that maker publishes, counted.

↑