Chu II vs Variations: which needs more amplifier?

The Moondrop Chu II is 18Ω at 101.6 dB/mW; the Moondrop Variations is 15.2Ω at 99.8 dB/mW. This page is only about what they ask of an amplifier — not how they sound, which no specification on either sheet can tell you.

The Variations needs 1.8 dB more than the Chu II to reach the same loudness — 1.0 mW against 0.69 mW.

The numbers that decide it

SpecificationChu IIVariations
Impedance18 Ω15.2 Ω
Sensitivity101.6 dB/mW99.8 dB/mW
Sensitivity (voltage)119.0 dB/V118.0 dB/V
Power for 100 dB0.69 mW1.0 mW
Voltage for 100 dB0.11 V0.13 V
Current for 100 dB6.2 mA8.3 mA
Highest source impedance
that leaves them alone (one-eighth rule)
2.25 Ω1.90 Ω
Sources that reach 100 dB
out of 280
280280

Where the two part company

Every source in the database that drives one of them drives the other. On power, the choice between these two changes nothing about what amplifier you need.

3 sources are low enough in output impedance for the Chu II under the one-eighth rule but not for the Variations (Astell&Kern HC3, RME Fireface UFX II, RME Fireface UFX III).

280 of the 280 sources here reach 100 dB on both. That count is about power only — the output-impedance and hiss lines above are separate questions, and a source can pass this one and fail those.

Both pages in full

Each model has a page of its own with the full source list, the hiss estimate and the provenance of every figure above: Moondrop Chu II and Moondrop Variations. Every figure on this page comes from what Moondrop published, or is derived from it — what that maker publishes, counted.