The Sivga Luan is 38Ω at 100.0 dB (no reference unit printed); the Sivga P-II is 32Ω at 98.0 dB (no reference unit printed). This page covers what they ask of an amplifier, not how they sound.
The P-II needs 2.0 dB more than the Luan to reach the same loudness — 1.6 mW against 1.0 mW.
| Specification | Luan | P-II |
|---|---|---|
| Impedance | 38 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100.0 dB | 98.0 dB |
| Sensitivity (voltage) | 114.2 dB/V | 112.9 dB/V |
| Power for 100 dB | 1.0 mW | 1.6 mW |
| Voltage for 100 dB | 0.19 V | 0.23 V |
| Current for 100 dB | 5.1 mA | 7.0 mA |
| Highest source impedance that leaves them alone (one-eighth rule) | 4.75 Ω | 4.00 Ω |
| Sources that reach 100 dB out of 280 | 280 | 280 |
One caution before reading the rows. Sivga Luan and Sivga P-II printed a decibel figure with no reference unit, so this page reads it as per milliwatt. If it is really per volt, each of them needs far more than the table says. Why the two readings differ by so much.
Every source in the database that drives one of them drives the other. On power, the choice between these two changes nothing about what amplifier you need.
1 source is low enough in output impedance for the Luan under the one-eighth rule but not for the P-II (Shanling H5).
280 of the 280 sources here reach 100 dB on both.
The P-II is more demanding than 63% of the 567 non-electrostatic models in this database; the Luan than 57%.
| dB SPL | Luan power | Luan voltage | P-II power | P-II voltage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80 | 0.01 mW | 19 mV | 0.02 mW | 23 mV |
| 85 | 0.03 mW | 35 mV | 0.05 mW | 40 mV |
| 90 | 0.10 mW | 62 mV | 0.16 mW | 71 mV |
| 95 | 0.32 mW | 0.11 V | 0.50 mW | 0.13 V |
| 100 | 1.0 mW | 0.19 V | 1.6 mW | 0.23 V |
| 105 | 3.2 mW | 0.35 V | 5.0 mW | 0.40 V |
| Source | Price | Headroom, Luan | Headroom, P-II | Output impedance | Noise |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JadeAudio JA11 | $20 | 14.0 dB | 12.8 dB | 0.5 Ω | 1.7 µV |
| FiiO KA11 | $29 | 22.3 dB | 21.0 dB | 0.7 Ω | 1.7 µV |
| FiiO BTR11 | $36 | 14.0 dB | 12.8 dB | 0.5 Ω | 8.0 µV |
Of the 280 sources here, 280 reach 100 dB on both. 69 of them also publish an output impedance low enough for both under the one-eighth rule and a noise figure that stays below the audible-hiss threshold with both.
The cheapest of the 69 is the JadeAudio JA11, at $20. It leaves 14.0 dB of headroom on the Luan and 12.8 dB on the P-II, its output impedance is 0.5 Ω against a one-eighth limit of 4.75 Ω and 4.00 Ω, and its noise figure puts the hiss floor 21 dB and 22 dB below the 20 dB SPL this site treats as the point where a quiet room stops hiding it.
| Model | As printed | Tolerance | Standard |
|---|---|---|---|
| Luan | 20Hz - 40KHz | not printed | not printed |
| P-II | nothing printed | — | — |
Sivga prints 20Hz - 40KHz for the Luan and nothing at all for the P-II.
P-II: Sivga’s page for the P-II has a SPECIFICATION block with four tabs — description, introduction, parameters, packaging — and the parameters tab is empty. Their pages for other models fill that same tab with a table that includes a frequency response; this one has nothing in it.
So one side of this comparison has a frequency-response number and the other does not — which changes less than it looks. The range printed for the Luan comes with no tolerance beside it, and a range without a ±dB figure says nothing about how loud the headphone is at either end of it: thirty decibels down at the bottom and the sentence would still be true. On the only reading that would have made it a specification, the two sheets say the same amount: nothing.
Not a measurement; maker by maker.
Both have a page of their own. In full: Sivga Luan and Sivga P-II. Each figure on this page is labelled on those pages with where it came from, including the ones Sivga never published — what that maker publishes, counted.