Quietest sources for sensitive in-ears

Hiss is the half of amplifier matching that power figures cannot warn you about, and it is the half that decides whether a sensitive in-ear is pleasant to use. This sorts every dongle and Bluetooth receiver here by the noise figure its own maker published, and counts how many of the 222 in-ears in this database stay below the audible-hiss threshold on it.

The count in the last column is not a measurement of the product. It is arithmetic: the maker’s noise figure delivered into each in-ear’s own sensitivity and impedance. Two products with the same microvolts will hiss identically; what differs is which headphones you put on the end.

Sorted on one published figure

SourcePricePublished noiseIn-ears it stays quiet with
iBasso DC03 Pro$690.9 µV221 of 222
FiiO BTR13$59µV221 of 222
EPZ TP50$210µV221 of 222
Tanchjim Space$701.1 µV221 of 222
Tanchjim LUNA$1401.3 µV221 of 222
Moondrop Dawn Pro$751.5 µV220 of 222
Moondrop Moonriver 2 Ti$1901.5 µV220 of 222
Truthear SHIO$701.6 µV220 of 222
FiiO KA5$991.6 µV220 of 222
JadeAudio JA11$201.7 µV220 of 222
FiiO KA11$291.7 µV220 of 222
FiiO KA3$791.7 µV220 of 222
HiBy FC4$991.7 µV220 of 222
FiiO KA15$1091.7 µV220 of 222
FiiO BTR15$109µV217 of 222

The table shows the first 15 of 22. The rest are in the full source list, where every figure is labelled with where it came from.

42 of the 64 dongles and Bluetooth receivers could not be placed on this list at all, because their makers never published the figure it sorts by. They are not at the bottom of the ranking; they are absent from it. Any list of this kind that does not say so is quietly presenting a fraction of the market as the whole of it.

This is not a ranking of sound quality and cannot be. It sorts one number that manufacturers printed, and manufacturers do not print anything about how their products sound. Every row links to that product’s own page, where each figure is labelled with the document it came from.

Same database, different question