Short answer
Both are audio interfaces, $299 against $199.
The Apogee BOOM reaches 100 dB on 565 of the 567 models here, the Tascam US-2x2HR on 541.
| Specification | Apogee BOOM | Tascam US-2x2HR |
|---|---|---|
| Power into 32Ω | 240 mW | 18 mW |
| Power into 150Ω | 51 mW | 17 mW |
| Power into 300Ω | 26 mW | 12 mW |
| Power into 600Ω | 13 mW | 7.3 mW |
| Output impedance | 0.5 Ω | 66 Ω |
| Output noise | not published | not published |
| Price | $299 | $199 |
| Headphones it reaches 100 dB on out of 567 | 565 | 541 |
Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.
| Load | Apogee BOOM | Tascam US-2x2HR |
|---|---|---|
| 32 Ω | Published | Published |
| 150 Ω | Derived | Derived |
| 300 Ω | Derived | Derived |
| 600 Ω | Derived | Derived |
Both makers publish a power rating. Apogee BOOM publishes at 32 Ω; Tascam US-2x2HR at 32 Ω. The other rows are worked out from those.
The two publish at the same loads, which is the one case where the rows of this table can be read straight across.
24 headphones reach 100 dB on the Apogee BOOM but not on the Tascam US-2x2HR — Abyss AB-1266 Phi TC, Audeze LCD-5, Dan Clark Audio AEON 2 Closed, 21 more.
563 headphones are left alone by the Apogee BOOM under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the Tascam US-2x2HR (64 Audio Aspire 1, 64 Audio Fourte, 64 Audio Nio, 560 more).
541 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.
Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.
The widest gap on the list is the Shure SE846: Apogee BOOM has +32 dB of headroom there against +21 dB. 11 dB is about 13 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.
The hiss columns are empty for Apogee BOOM and Tascam US-2x2HR because neither maker publishes no output noise figure.
| Headphone | Impedance | Needs | Apogee BOOM headroom | Tascam US-2x2HR headroom | Apogee BOOM hiss | Tascam US-2x2HR hiss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shure SE846 | 9 Ω | 0.04 mW | +32 dB | +21 dB damping | not published | not published |
| Campfire Audio Andromeda 2020 | 9 Ω | 4.0 mW | +12 dB | +1 dB damping | not published | not published |
| Audeze LCD-2 Classic | 70 Ω | 0.79 mW | +21 dB | +13 dB damping | not published | not published |
| Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω) | 250 Ω | 0.63 mW | +17 dB | +13 dB damping | not published | not published |
| HiFiMAN HE400se | 25 Ω | 7.9 mW | +14 dB | +2 dB damping | not published | not published |
| Audio-Technica ATH-R70X | 470 Ω | 1.6 mW | +10 dB | +7 dB damping | not published | not published |
| Sennheiser HD 600 | 300 Ω | 6.6 mW | +6 dB | +3 dB damping | not published | not published |
| HiFiMAN Susvara | 60 Ω | 50 mW | +4 dB | -5 dB damping | not published | not published |
The Apogee BOOM costs $100 more than the Tascam US-2x2HR. Out of the 567 models here, that difference buys 24 more models driven to 100 dB and 563 more models left alone under the one-eighth rule.
Nothing runs the other way: there is no axis here on which the cheaper of the two does better.
Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.
Each in full: Apogee BOOM and Tascam US-2x2HR.