Apogee Symphony Desktop vs RME ADI-2 DAC FS

Short answer

  • More power: the RME ADI-2 DAC FS, with 1.20 W into 32 Ω; the Apogee Symphony Desktop has 490 mW. The RME ADI-2 DAC FS drives 1 headphone to 100 dB that the Apogee Symphony Desktop cannot (Symphonium Titan).
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — the maker of the Apogee Symphony Desktop publishes no noise figure.
  • Price: the RME ADI-2 DAC FS costs $96 less, and wherever both makers publish a figure the Apogee Symphony Desktop shows no advantage for the extra money.

Both are audio interfaces, $1495 against $1399.

The RME ADI-2 DAC FS reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here, the Apogee Symphony Desktop on 566.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationApogee Symphony DesktopRME ADI-2 DAC FS
Power into 32Ω490 mW1.2 W
Power into 150Ω145 mW256 mW
Power into 300Ω103 mW128 mW
Power into 600Ω90 mW64 mW
Output impedancenot published0.1 Ω
Output noisenot published2.18 µV
Price$1495$1399
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
566567

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadApogee Symphony DesktopRME ADI-2 DAC FS
32 ΩDerivedPublished
150 ΩDerivedDerived
300 ΩDerivedDerived
600 ΩPublishedDerived

Both makers publish a power rating. Apogee Symphony Desktop publishes at 600 Ω; RME ADI-2 DAC FS at 32 Ω. The other rows are worked out from those.

So the two columns are not equally firm row by row: at 600 Ω only the Apogee Symphony Desktop figure is the maker’s own and at 32 Ω only the RME ADI-2 DAC FS figure is the maker’s own. On those rows the derived number is the one to doubt first.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

1 headphone reaches 100 dB on the RME ADI-2 DAC FS but not on the Apogee Symphony Desktop — Symphonium Titan.

566 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Shure SE846: RME ADI-2 DAC FS has +41 dB of headroom there against +36 dB. 5 dB is about 3.4 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for Apogee Symphony Desktop because that maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsApogee Symphony Desktop headroomRME ADI-2 DAC FS headroomApogee Symphony Desktop hissRME ADI-2 DAC FS hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+36 dB+41 dBnot published21 dB
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+16 dB+21 dBnot published1 dB
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+25 dB+28 dBnot published-1 dB
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+22 dB+24 dBnot published-5 dB
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+17 dB+21 dBnot published-6 dB
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+18 dB+17 dBnot published-12 dB
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+12 dB+13 dBnot published-16 dB
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+8 dB+11 dBnot published-18 dB

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The Apogee Symphony Desktop costs $96 more than the RME ADI-2 DAC FS, and on these three axes the money buys nothing: among the 567 models here there is not one that the Apogee Symphony Desktop handles and the RME ADI-2 DAC FS does not — not on power, not on the one-eighth rule, not on hiss. The traffic runs the other way: the cheaper RME ADI-2 DAC FS drives one model to 100 dB that the Apogee Symphony Desktop does not.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

↑