Astell&Kern HC4 vs Qudelix T71

Short answer

  • More power: the Qudelix T71, with 500 mW into 32 Ω; the Astell&Kern HC4 has 125 mW (balanced: 2.00 W against 281 mW). The Qudelix T71 drives 5 headphones to 100 dB that the Astell&Kern HC4 cannot (Moondrop COSMO, Moondrop PARA, Symphonium Crimson, 2 more).
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — the maker of the Astell&Kern HC4 publishes no noise figure.
  • Price: the Qudelix T71 costs $10 more; what that buys on these numbers is set out further down, under What the price difference buys.

Both are dongles, $219 against $229.

The Qudelix T71 reaches 100 dB on 566 of the 567 models here, the Astell&Kern HC4 on 561.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationAstell&Kern HC4Qudelix T71
Power into 32Ω125 mW500 mW
Power into 150Ω27 mW107 mW
Power into 300Ω13 mW53 mW
Power into 600Ω6.7 mW27 mW
Output impedance0.9 Ω0.3 Ω unverified
Output noisenot published2.5 µV unverified
Price$219$229
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
561566

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

The 4.4 mm or XLR socket, rated on its own

BalancedAstell&Kern HC4Qudelix T71
Socket4.4mm2.5mm+4.4mm
Power into 32Ω281 mW derived2.0 W derived
Power into 300Ω30 mW derived213 mW derived
Output impedance1.6 Ωnot published
Output noisenot publishednot published
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
565567

Through the balanced sockets the Qudelix T71 reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here and the Astell&Kern HC4 on 565. Derived figures are worked out from the loads the maker did publish.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadAstell&Kern HC4Qudelix T71
32 ΩUpper boundUpper bound
150 ΩUpper boundUpper bound
300 ΩUpper boundUpper bound
600 ΩUpper boundUpper bound

Neither maker publishes a power rating at any load. Both columns above are ceilings, worked out from a maximum output voltage on the assumption that the amplifier holds it into the load — the most flattering reading available for either. 24 of the 280 sources here are in that position. Whichever of the two looks the stronger on power, the difference is unproven; the output-impedance and noise rows are the ones to go on.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

5 headphones reach 100 dB on the Qudelix T71 but not on the Astell&Kern HC4 — Moondrop COSMO, Moondrop PARA, Symphonium Crimson, 2 more.

561 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Sennheiser HD 600: Qudelix T71 has +9 dB of headroom there against +3 dB. 6 dB is about 4 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for Astell&Kern HC4 and Qudelix T71 because neither maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsAstell&Kern HC4 headroomQudelix T71 headroomAstell&Kern HC4 hissQudelix T71 hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+29 dB+35 dBnot publishednot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+9 dB+15 dBnot publishednot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+19 dB+25 dBnot publishednot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+14 dB+20 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+11 dB+17 dBnot publishednot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+7 dB+13 dBnot publishednot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+3 dB+9 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+1 dB+7 dBnot publishednot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The Qudelix T71 costs $10 more than the Astell&Kern HC4. Out of the 567 models here, that difference buys 5 more models driven to 100 dB.

Nothing runs the other way: there is no axis here on which the cheaper of the two does better.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

Each in full: Astell&Kern HC4 and Qudelix T71.

↑