Astell&Kern SP3000 vs Shanling M9 Plus

Both are portable players, $3700 against $2959. This page puts them side by side on the only three things a maker can be held to — power, output impedance and noise — and then asks the question that actually matters: which headphones do they treat differently?

The Shanling M9 Plus reaches 100 dB on 566 of the 567 models here, the Astell&Kern SP3000 on 565.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationAstell&Kern SP3000Shanling M9 Plus
Power into 32Ω340 mW520 mW
Power into 150Ω73 mW111 mW
Power into 300Ω36 mW55 mW
Power into 600Ω18 mW28 mW
Output impedance0.7 Ω1 Ω
Output noise3 µV unverifiednot published
Price$3700$2959
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
565566

A figure marked not published is missing from the maker’s own material, which is not the same as being good or bad. Where one of these two publishes a number and the other does not, the comparison on that axis cannot be made at all — and saying so is more useful than guessing.

The headphones that tell them apart

1 headphone reaches 100 dB on the Shanling M9 Plus but not on the Astell&Kern SP3000 — Moondrop PARA.

11 headphones are left alone by the Astell&Kern SP3000 under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the Shanling M9 Plus (64 Audio Nio, 64 Audio Volur, Campfire Audio Andromeda 2023, 8 more).

565 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both. That is a power count and nothing more; whether either source suits a given headphone also depends on the two lines above.

Both pages in full

Each has a page of its own with every power figure traced to what the maker published and a full headphone list: Astell&Kern SP3000 and Shanling M9 Plus. Or put either against your own headphones in the source comparison tool.