Astell&Kern SR35 vs Cayin N3 Ultra

Short answer

  • Power: about the same. The Astell&Kern SR35 has 300 mW into 32 Ω, the Cayin N3 Ultra 250 mW (balanced: 1.12 W and 600 mW). Both drive 565 of the 567 non-electrostatic headphones here to 100 dB, so on that test the difference changes nothing.
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — the maker of the Cayin N3 Ultra publishes no noise figure.
  • Output impedance: 27 headphones are left alone by the Cayin N3 Ultra under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the Astell&Kern SR35 (64 Audio Nio, 64 Audio U18s, 64 Audio Volur, 24 more).
  • Price: the Cayin N3 Ultra costs $151 less, and wherever both makers publish a figure the Astell&Kern SR35 shows no advantage for the extra money.

Both are portable players, $800 against $649.

On raw power they are level: each reaches 100 dB on 565 of the 567 non-electrostatic models here.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationAstell&Kern SR35Cayin N3 Ultra
Power into 32Ω300 mW250 mW
Power into 150Ω64 mW53 mW
Power into 300Ω32 mW27 mW
Power into 600Ω16 mW13 mW
Output impedance1.1 Ω0.5 Ω
Output noise4 µV unverifiednot published
Price$800$649
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
565565

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

The 4.4 mm or XLR socket, rated on its own

BalancedAstell&Kern SR35Cayin N3 Ultra
Socket4.4mm and 2.5mm4.4mm
Power into 32Ω1.1 W derived600 mW
Power into 300Ω120 mW derived64 mW derived
Output impedance2.7 Ω1 Ω
Output noisenot publishednot published
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
567566

Through the balanced sockets the Astell&Kern SR35 reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here and the Cayin N3 Ultra on 566. Derived figures are worked out from the loads the maker did publish.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadAstell&Kern SR35Cayin N3 Ultra
32 ΩUpper boundPublished
150 ΩUpper boundDerived
300 ΩUpper boundDerived
600 ΩUpper boundDerived

These two columns are not the same kind of number, and that matters more than the gap between them. Cayin N3 Ultra publishes a power rating (at 32 Ω); Astell&Kern SR35 publishes no power figure at any load, only a maximum output voltage, so every milliwatt in its column is a ceiling worked out from that voltage.

A ceiling assumes the amplifier holds that voltage into the load, and nothing on Astell&Kern SR35’s own sheet says it does. It is the most flattering reading available, and it is used here only because the alternative is a blank. Where the Astell&Kern SR35 column looks the stronger of the two, treat the difference as unproven rather than measured. 24 of the 280 sources here are in that position, with no published power rating at any load.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

On power they are interchangeable across this whole database: there is no headphone here that one reaches 100 dB on and the other does not.

27 headphones are left alone by the Cayin N3 Ultra under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the Astell&Kern SR35 (64 Audio Nio, 64 Audio U18s, 64 Audio Volur, 24 more).

565 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Audeze LCD-2 Classic: Astell&Kern SR35 has +22 dB of headroom there against +22 dB. 1 dB is about 1.2 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for Astell&Kern SR35 and Cayin N3 Ultra because neither maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsAstell&Kern SR35 headroomCayin N3 Ultra headroomAstell&Kern SR35 hissCayin N3 Ultra hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+33 dB+32 dBnot publishednot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+13 dB+12 dBnot publishednot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+22 dB+22 dBnot publishednot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+18 dB+17 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+15 dB+14 dBnot publishednot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+11 dB+10 dBnot publishednot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+7 dB+6 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+5 dB+4 dBnot publishednot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The Astell&Kern SR35 costs $151 more than the Cayin N3 Ultra, and on these three axes the money buys nothing: among the 567 models here there is not one that the Astell&Kern SR35 handles and the Cayin N3 Ultra does not — not on power, not on the one-eighth rule, not on hiss. The traffic runs the other way: the cheaper Cayin N3 Ultra leaves 27 models alone under the one-eighth rule that the Astell&Kern SR35 does not.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

Each in full: Astell&Kern SR35 and Cayin N3 Ultra.

↑