Audient EVO 16 vs Audient iD44 MkII

Short answer

  • More power: the Audient iD44 MkII, with 190 mW into 32 Ω; the Audient EVO 16 has 87 mW. The Audient iD44 MkII drives 7 headphones to 100 dB that the Audient EVO 16 cannot (Moondrop COSMO, Moondrop PARA 2, Moondrop VENUS, 4 more).
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — neither maker publishes a noise figure.
  • Price: the Audient iD44 MkII costs $59 more; what that buys on these numbers is set out further down, under What the price difference buys.

Both are audio interfaces, $750 against $809.

The Audient iD44 MkII reaches 100 dB on 565 of the 567 models here, the Audient EVO 16 on 558.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationAudient EVO 16Audient iD44 MkII
Power into 32Ω87 mW190 mW
Power into 150Ω49 mW40 mW
Power into 300Ω32 mW42 mW
Power into 600Ω24 mW54 mW
Output impedance50 Ω50 Ω
Output noisenot publishednot published
Price$750$809
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
558565

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadAudient EVO 16Audient iD44 MkII
32 ΩDerivedDerived
150 ΩDerivedDerived
300 ΩDerivedDerived
600 ΩPublishedPublished

Both makers publish a power rating. Audient EVO 16 publishes at 600 Ω; Audient iD44 MkII at 600 Ω. The other rows are worked out from those.

The two publish at the same loads, which is the one case where the rows of this table can be read straight across.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

7 headphones reach 100 dB on the Audient iD44 MkII but not on the Audient EVO 16 — Moondrop COSMO, Moondrop PARA 2, Moondrop VENUS, 4 more.

558 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Shure SE846: Audient iD44 MkII has +32 dB of headroom there against +28 dB. 4 dB is about 2.4 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for Audient EVO 16 and Audient iD44 MkII because neither maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsAudient EVO 16 headroomAudient iD44 MkII headroomAudient EVO 16 hissAudient iD44 MkII hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+28 dB damping+32 dB dampingnot publishednot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+8 dB damping+12 dB dampingnot publishednot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+21 dB damping+18 dB dampingnot publishednot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+17 dB damping+18 dB dampingnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+10 dB damping+13 dB dampingnot publishednot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+12 dB+15 dBnot publishednot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+7 dB damping+8 dB dampingnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+3 dB damping+0 dB dampingnot publishednot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The Audient iD44 MkII costs $59 more than the Audient EVO 16. Out of the 567 models here, that difference buys 7 more models driven to 100 dB.

Nothing runs the other way: there is no axis here on which the cheaper of the two does better.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

↑