Audient EVO 16 vs Audient NERO

Short answer

  • Power: about the same. The Audient EVO 16 has 87 mW into 32 Ω, the Audient NERO 86 mW. The Audient NERO drives 1 headphone to 100 dB that the Audient EVO 16 cannot (Symphonium Triton).
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — neither maker publishes a noise figure.
  • Price: the Audient NERO costs $30 less, and wherever both makers publish a figure the Audient EVO 16 shows no advantage for the extra money.

Both are audio interfaces, $750 against $720.

The Audient NERO reaches 100 dB on 559 of the 567 models here, the Audient EVO 16 on 558.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationAudient EVO 16Audient NERO
Power into 32Ω87 mW86 mW
Power into 150Ω49 mW23 mW
Power into 300Ω32 mW13 mW
Power into 600Ω24 mW7.4 mW
Output impedance50 Ωnot published
Output noisenot publishednot published
Price$750$720
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
558559

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadAudient EVO 16Audient NERO
32 ΩDerivedDerived
150 ΩDerivedDerived
300 ΩDerivedDerived
600 ΩPublishedPublished

Both makers publish a power rating. Audient EVO 16 publishes at 600 Ω; Audient NERO at 600 Ω. The other rows are worked out from those.

The two publish at the same loads, which is the one case where the rows of this table can be read straight across.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

1 headphone reaches 100 dB on the Audient NERO but not on the Audient EVO 16 — Symphonium Triton.

558 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Audio-Technica ATH-R70X: Audient EVO 16 has +12 dB of headroom there against +7 dB. 5 dB is about 2.9 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for Audient EVO 16 and Audient NERO because neither maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsAudient EVO 16 headroomAudient NERO headroomAudient EVO 16 hissAudient NERO hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+28 dB damping+28 dBnot publishednot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+8 dB damping+8 dBnot publishednot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+21 dB damping+18 dBnot publishednot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+17 dB damping+14 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+10 dB damping+10 dBnot publishednot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+12 dB+7 dBnot publishednot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+7 dB damping+3 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+3 dB damping+0 dBnot publishednot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The Audient EVO 16 costs $30 more than the Audient NERO, and on these three axes the money buys nothing: among the 567 models here there is not one that the Audient EVO 16 handles and the Audient NERO does not — not on power, not on the one-eighth rule, not on hiss. The traffic runs the other way: the cheaper Audient NERO drives one model to 100 dB that the Audient EVO 16 does not.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

Each in full: Audient EVO 16 and Audient NERO.

↑