Short answer
Both are audio interfaces, $750 against $699.
The MOTU UltraLite-mk5 reaches 100 dB on 566 of the 567 models here, the Audient EVO 16 on 558.
| Specification | Audient EVO 16 | MOTU UltraLite-mk5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power into 32Ω | 87 mW | 471 mW |
| Power into 150Ω | 49 mW | 100 mW |
| Power into 300Ω | 32 mW | 50 mW |
| Power into 600Ω | 24 mW | 25 mW |
| Output impedance | 50 Ω | 1 Ω |
| Output noise | not published | not published |
| Price | $750 | $699 |
| Headphones it reaches 100 dB on out of 567 | 558 | 566 |
Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.
| Load | Audient EVO 16 | MOTU UltraLite-mk5 |
|---|---|---|
| 32 Ω | Derived | Upper bound |
| 150 Ω | Derived | Upper bound |
| 300 Ω | Derived | Upper bound |
| 600 Ω | Published | Upper bound |
These two columns are not the same kind of number, and that matters more than the gap between them. Audient EVO 16 publishes a power rating (at 600 Ω); MOTU UltraLite-mk5 publishes no power figure at any load, only a maximum output voltage, so every milliwatt in its column is a ceiling worked out from that voltage.
A ceiling assumes the amplifier holds that voltage into the load, and nothing on MOTU UltraLite-mk5’s own sheet says it does. It is the most flattering reading available, and it is used here only because the alternative is a blank. Where the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 column looks the stronger of the two, treat the difference as unproven rather than measured. 24 of the 280 sources here are in that position, with no published power rating at any load.
8 headphones reach 100 dB on the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 but not on the Audient EVO 16 — Moondrop COSMO, Moondrop PARA, Moondrop PARA 2, 5 more.
546 headphones are left alone by the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the Audient EVO 16 (64 Audio Aspire 1, 64 Audio Fourte, 64 Audio Ocean, 543 more).
558 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.
Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.
The widest gap on the list is the HiFiMAN HE400se: MOTU UltraLite-mk5 has +17 dB of headroom there against +10 dB. 7 dB is about 5.1 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.
The hiss columns are empty for Audient EVO 16 and MOTU UltraLite-mk5 because neither maker publishes no output noise figure.
| Headphone | Impedance | Needs | Audient EVO 16 headroom | MOTU UltraLite-mk5 headroom | Audient EVO 16 hiss | MOTU UltraLite-mk5 hiss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shure SE846 | 9 Ω | 0.04 mW | +28 dB damping | +35 dB | not published | not published |
| Campfire Audio Andromeda 2020 | 9 Ω | 4.0 mW | +8 dB damping | +15 dB | not published | not published |
| Audeze LCD-2 Classic | 70 Ω | 0.79 mW | +21 dB damping | +24 dB | not published | not published |
| Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω) | 250 Ω | 0.63 mW | +17 dB damping | +20 dB | not published | not published |
| HiFiMAN HE400se | 25 Ω | 7.9 mW | +10 dB damping | +17 dB | not published | not published |
| Audio-Technica ATH-R70X | 470 Ω | 1.6 mW | +12 dB | +13 dB | not published | not published |
| Sennheiser HD 600 | 300 Ω | 6.6 mW | +7 dB damping | +9 dB | not published | not published |
| HiFiMAN Susvara | 60 Ω | 50 mW | +3 dB damping | +7 dB | not published | not published |
The Audient EVO 16 costs $51 more than the MOTU UltraLite-mk5, and on these three axes the money buys nothing: among the 567 models here there is not one that the Audient EVO 16 handles and the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 does not — not on power, not on the one-eighth rule, not on hiss. The traffic runs the other way: the cheaper MOTU UltraLite-mk5 drives 8 models to 100 dB and leaves 546 alone under the one-eighth rule that the Audient EVO 16 does not.
Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.
Each in full: Audient EVO 16 and MOTU UltraLite-mk5.