Audient NERO vs MOTU UltraLite-mk5

Short answer

  • More power: the MOTU UltraLite-mk5, with 471 mW into 32 Ω; the Audient NERO has 86 mW. The MOTU UltraLite-mk5 drives 7 headphones to 100 dB that the Audient NERO cannot (Moondrop COSMO, Moondrop PARA, Moondrop PARA 2, 4 more).
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — neither maker publishes a noise figure.
  • Price: the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 costs $21 less, and wherever both makers publish a figure the Audient NERO shows no advantage for the extra money.

Both are audio interfaces, $720 against $699.

The MOTU UltraLite-mk5 reaches 100 dB on 566 of the 567 models here, the Audient NERO on 559.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationAudient NEROMOTU UltraLite-mk5
Power into 32Ω86 mW471 mW
Power into 150Ω23 mW100 mW
Power into 300Ω13 mW50 mW
Power into 600Ω7.4 mW25 mW
Output impedancenot published1 Ω
Output noisenot publishednot published
Price$720$699
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
559566

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadAudient NEROMOTU UltraLite-mk5
32 ΩDerivedUpper bound
150 ΩDerivedUpper bound
300 ΩDerivedUpper bound
600 ΩPublishedUpper bound

These two columns are not the same kind of number, and that matters more than the gap between them. Audient NERO publishes a power rating (at 600 Ω); MOTU UltraLite-mk5 publishes no power figure at any load, only a maximum output voltage, so every milliwatt in its column is a ceiling worked out from that voltage.

A ceiling assumes the amplifier holds that voltage into the load, and nothing on MOTU UltraLite-mk5’s own sheet says it does. It is the most flattering reading available, and it is used here only because the alternative is a blank. Where the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 column looks the stronger of the two, treat the difference as unproven rather than measured. 24 of the 280 sources here are in that position, with no published power rating at any load.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

7 headphones reach 100 dB on the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 but not on the Audient NERO — Moondrop COSMO, Moondrop PARA, Moondrop PARA 2, 4 more.

559 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Campfire Audio Andromeda 2020: MOTU UltraLite-mk5 has +15 dB of headroom there against +8 dB. 7 dB is about 4.9 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for Audient NERO and MOTU UltraLite-mk5 because neither maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsAudient NERO headroomMOTU UltraLite-mk5 headroomAudient NERO hissMOTU UltraLite-mk5 hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+28 dB+35 dBnot publishednot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+8 dB+15 dBnot publishednot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+18 dB+24 dBnot publishednot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+14 dB+20 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+10 dB+17 dBnot publishednot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+7 dB+13 dBnot publishednot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+3 dB+9 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+0 dB+7 dBnot publishednot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The Audient NERO costs $21 more than the MOTU UltraLite-mk5, and on these three axes the money buys nothing: among the 567 models here there is not one that the Audient NERO handles and the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 does not — not on power, not on the one-eighth rule, not on hiss. The traffic runs the other way: the cheaper MOTU UltraLite-mk5 drives 7 models to 100 dB that the Audient NERO does not.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

Each in full: Audient NERO and MOTU UltraLite-mk5.

↑