Aune S17 Pro EVO vs Schiit Lyr 5

Short answer

  • More power: the Schiit Lyr 5, with 6.00 W into 32 Ω; the Aune S17 Pro EVO has 2.05 W. Both drive 567 of the 567 non-electrostatic headphones here to 100 dB, so on that test the difference changes nothing.
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — the maker of the Aune S17 Pro EVO publishes no noise figure.
  • Output impedance: 14 headphones are left alone by the Schiit Lyr 5 under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the Aune S17 Pro EVO (64 Audio Nio, 64 Audio Volur, Campfire Audio Andromeda 2023, 11 more).
  • Price: the same, $799.

Both are desktop amplifiers, both at $799.

On raw power they are level: each reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 non-electrostatic models here.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationAune S17 Pro EVOSchiit Lyr 5
Power into 32Ω2.0 W6.0 W
Power into 150Ω464 mW1.5 W
Power into 300Ω235 mW900 mW
Power into 600Ω117 mW450 mW
Output impedance1 Ω0.4 Ω
Output noisenot published3.99 µV
Price$799$799
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
567567

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

The 4.4 mm or XLR socket, rated on its own

BalancedAune S17 Pro EVOSchiit Lyr 5
SocketXLR4 and 4.4mmno separate rating
Power into 32Ω7.5 W—
Power into 300Ω918 mW—
Output impedance1 Ω—
Output noisenot published—
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
567—

Only the Aune S17 Pro EVO has a separate balanced rating from its maker; through it, it reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here. The Schiit Lyr 5 may still have a balanced socket — its spec sheet simply gives no figure for one, so there is nothing to put beside it.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadAune S17 Pro EVOSchiit Lyr 5
32 ΩPublishedPublished
150 ΩPublishedDerived
300 ΩPublishedPublished
600 ΩPublishedPublished

Both makers publish a power rating. Aune S17 Pro EVO publishes at 32 Ω, at 150 Ω, at 300 Ω and at 600 Ω; Schiit Lyr 5 at 32 Ω, at 300 Ω and at 600 Ω. The other rows are worked out from those.

So the two columns are not equally firm row by row: at 150 Ω only the Aune S17 Pro EVO figure is the maker’s own. On those rows the derived number is the one to doubt first.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

On power they are interchangeable across this whole database: there is no headphone here that one reaches 100 dB on and the other does not.

14 headphones are left alone by the Schiit Lyr 5 under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the Aune S17 Pro EVO (64 Audio Nio, 64 Audio Volur, Campfire Audio Andromeda 2023, 11 more).

567 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Shure SE846: Schiit Lyr 5 has +51 dB of headroom there against +42 dB. 9 dB is about 8.8 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for Aune S17 Pro EVO because that maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsAune S17 Pro EVO headroomSchiit Lyr 5 headroomAune S17 Pro EVO hissSchiit Lyr 5 hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+42 dB+51 dBnot published26 dB
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+22 dB+31 dBnot published6 dB
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+31 dB+36 dBnot published5 dB
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+27 dB+32 dBnot published0 dB
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+23 dB+29 dBnot published-1 dB
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+20 dB+26 dBnot published-7 dB
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+16 dB+21 dBnot published-11 dB
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+13 dB+18 dBnot published-13 dB

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

These two cost the same, $799, so price settles nothing. Out of the 567 models here, the Schiit Lyr 5 leaves 14 models alone under the one-eighth rule — and on the other side there is no such advantage at all.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

Each in full: Aune S17 Pro EVO and Schiit Lyr 5.

↑