Aune S17 Pro EVO vs SMSL VMV P2 MK2

Short answer

  • Power: about the same. The Aune S17 Pro EVO has 2.05 W into 32 Ω, the SMSL VMV P2 MK2 2.00 W (balanced: 7.50 W and 8.00 W). Both drive 567 of the 567 non-electrostatic headphones here to 100 dB, so on that test the difference changes nothing.
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — neither maker publishes a noise figure.
  • Output impedance: 15 headphones are left alone by the SMSL VMV P2 MK2 under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the Aune S17 Pro EVO (64 Audio Nio, 64 Audio Volur, Campfire Audio Andromeda 2023, 12 more).
  • Price: the SMSL VMV P2 MK2 costs $361 more; what that buys on these numbers is set out further down, under What the price difference buys.

Both are desktop amplifiers, $799 against $1160.

On raw power they are level: each reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 non-electrostatic models here.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationAune S17 Pro EVOSMSL VMV P2 MK2
Power into 32Ω2.0 W2.0 W
Power into 150Ω464 mW499 mW
Power into 300Ω235 mW300 mW
Power into 600Ω117 mW150 mW
Output impedance1 Ω<0.1 Ω
Output noisenot publishednot published
Price$799$1160
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
567567

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

The 4.4 mm or XLR socket, rated on its own

BalancedAune S17 Pro EVOSMSL VMV P2 MK2
SocketXLR4 and 4.4mm4.4mm / 4-pin XLR
Power into 32Ω7.5 W8.0 W
Power into 300Ω918 mW1.0 W
Output impedance1 Ω<0.1 Ω
Output noisenot publishednot published
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
567567

Through the balanced sockets the two are level on the same test: each reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadAune S17 Pro EVOSMSL VMV P2 MK2
32 ΩPublishedPublished
150 ΩPublishedDerived
300 ΩPublishedPublished
600 ΩPublishedPublished

Both makers publish a power rating. Aune S17 Pro EVO publishes at 32 Ω, at 150 Ω, at 300 Ω and at 600 Ω; SMSL VMV P2 MK2 at 32 Ω, at 300 Ω and at 600 Ω. The other rows are worked out from those.

So the two columns are not equally firm row by row: at 150 Ω only the Aune S17 Pro EVO figure is the maker’s own. On those rows the derived number is the one to doubt first.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

On power they are interchangeable across this whole database: there is no headphone here that one reaches 100 dB on and the other does not.

15 headphones are left alone by the SMSL VMV P2 MK2 under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the Aune S17 Pro EVO (64 Audio Nio, 64 Audio Volur, Campfire Audio Andromeda 2023, 12 more).

567 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Campfire Audio Andromeda 2020: SMSL VMV P2 MK2 has +28 dB of headroom there against +22 dB. 6 dB is about 3.9 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for Aune S17 Pro EVO and SMSL VMV P2 MK2 because neither maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsAune S17 Pro EVO headroomSMSL VMV P2 MK2 headroomAune S17 Pro EVO hissSMSL VMV P2 MK2 hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+42 dB+48 dBnot publishednot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+22 dB+28 dBnot publishednot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+31 dB+31 dBnot publishednot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+27 dB+27 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+23 dB+25 dBnot publishednot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+20 dB+21 dBnot publishednot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+16 dB+17 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+13 dB+13 dBnot publishednot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The SMSL VMV P2 MK2 costs $361 more than the Aune S17 Pro EVO. Out of the 567 models here, that difference buys 15 more models left alone under the one-eighth rule.

Nothing runs the other way: there is no axis here on which the cheaper of the two does better.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

↑