Benchmark DAC3 HGC vs Ferrum ERCO

Short answer

  • Power: about the same. The Benchmark DAC3 HGC has 1.17 W into 32 Ω, the Ferrum ERCO 1.09 W. The Benchmark DAC3 HGC drives 1 headphone to 100 dB that the Ferrum ERCO cannot (Symphonium Titan).
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — neither maker publishes a noise figure.
  • Price: the Benchmark DAC3 HGC costs $349 more; what that buys on these numbers is set out further down, under What the price difference buys.

Both are desktop DAC/amps, $2399 against $2050.

The Benchmark DAC3 HGC reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here, the Ferrum ERCO on 566.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationBenchmark DAC3 HGCFerrum ERCO
Power into 32Ω1.2 W1.1 W
Power into 150Ω250 mW580 mW
Power into 300Ω125 mW300 mW
Power into 600Ω62 mW150 mW
Output impedance0.11 Ω0.3 Ω
Output noisenot publishednot published
Price$2399$2050
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
567566

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

The 4.4 mm or XLR socket, rated on its own

BalancedBenchmark DAC3 HGCFerrum ERCO
Socketno separate rating4-pin XLR
Power into 32Ω—3.9 W derived
Power into 300Ω—1.2 W
Output impedance—0.3 Ω
Output noise—not published
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
—567

Only the Ferrum ERCO has a separate balanced rating from its maker; through it, it reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here. The Benchmark DAC3 HGC may still have a balanced socket — its spec sheet simply gives no figure for one, so there is nothing to put beside it. Derived figures are worked out from the loads the maker did publish.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadBenchmark DAC3 HGCFerrum ERCO
32 ΩDerivedDerived
150 ΩDerivedDerived
300 ΩDerivedPublished
600 ΩDerivedDerived

Only one of these two columns starts from a power rating. Ferrum ERCO publishes one at 300 Ω; Benchmark DAC3 HGC publishes none at any of these four loads, so its column is worked out from power it published at other loads. Both are arithmetic on a maker’s own figures rather than guesses, and the method used for the Benchmark DAC3 HGC understates rather than flatters — but at 300 Ω is the only load here at which its maker can be held to a figure.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

1 headphone reaches 100 dB on the Benchmark DAC3 HGC but not on the Ferrum ERCO — Symphonium Titan.

566 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Audio-Technica ATH-R70X: Ferrum ERCO has +21 dB of headroom there against +17 dB. 4 dB is about 2.4 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for Benchmark DAC3 HGC and Ferrum ERCO because neither maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsBenchmark DAC3 HGC headroomFerrum ERCO headroomBenchmark DAC3 HGC hissFerrum ERCO hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+40 dB+39 dBnot publishednot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+20 dB+19 dBnot publishednot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+28 dB+32 dBnot publishednot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+24 dB+28 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+21 dB+20 dBnot publishednot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+17 dB+21 dBnot publishednot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+13 dB+17 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+11 dB+15 dBnot publishednot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The Benchmark DAC3 HGC costs $349 more than the Ferrum ERCO. Out of the 567 models here, that difference buys 1 more model driven to 100 dB.

Nothing runs the other way: there is no axis here on which the cheaper of the two does better.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

Each in full: Benchmark DAC3 HGC and Ferrum ERCO.

↑