Benchmark DAC3 HGC vs Matrix element M2

Short answer

  • Power: about the same. The Benchmark DAC3 HGC has 1.17 W into 32 Ω, the Matrix element M2 1.16 W. Both drive 567 of the 567 non-electrostatic headphones here to 100 dB, so on that test the difference changes nothing.
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — neither maker publishes a noise figure.
  • Output impedance: 520 headphones are left alone by the Benchmark DAC3 HGC under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the Matrix element M2 (64 Audio Aspire 1, 64 Audio Fourte, 64 Audio Nio, 517 more).
  • Price: the Benchmark DAC3 HGC costs $600 less, and wherever both makers publish a figure the Matrix element M2 shows no advantage for the extra money.

Both are desktop DAC/amps, $2399 against $2999.

On raw power they are level: each reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 non-electrostatic models here.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationBenchmark DAC3 HGCMatrix element M2
Power into 32Ω1.2 W1.2 W
Power into 150Ω250 mW380 mW
Power into 300Ω125 mW280 mW
Power into 600Ω62 mW140 mW
Output impedance0.11 Ω11 Ω
Output noisenot publishednot published
Price$2399$2999
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
567567

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

The 4.4 mm or XLR socket, rated on its own

BalancedBenchmark DAC3 HGCMatrix element M2
Socketno separate rating4.4mm
Power into 32Ω—1.7 W derived
Power into 300Ω—1.0 W
Output impedance—22 Ω
Output noise—not published
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
—567

Only the Matrix element M2 has a separate balanced rating from its maker; through it, it reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here. The Benchmark DAC3 HGC may still have a balanced socket — its spec sheet simply gives no figure for one, so there is nothing to put beside it. Derived figures are worked out from the loads the maker did publish.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadBenchmark DAC3 HGCMatrix element M2
32 ΩDerivedDerived
150 ΩDerivedDerived
300 ΩDerivedPublished
600 ΩDerivedPublished

Only one of these two columns starts from a power rating. Matrix element M2 publishes one at 300 Ω and at 600 Ω; Benchmark DAC3 HGC publishes none at any of these four loads, so its column is worked out from power it published at other loads. Both are arithmetic on a maker’s own figures rather than guesses, and the method used for the Benchmark DAC3 HGC understates rather than flatters — but at 300 Ω and at 600 Ω are the only loads here at which its maker can be held to a figure.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

On power they are interchangeable across this whole database: there is no headphone here that one reaches 100 dB on and the other does not.

520 headphones are left alone by the Benchmark DAC3 HGC under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the Matrix element M2 (64 Audio Aspire 1, 64 Audio Fourte, 64 Audio Nio, 517 more).

567 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Audio-Technica ATH-R70X: Matrix element M2 has +21 dB of headroom there against +17 dB. 4 dB is about 2.2 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for Benchmark DAC3 HGC and Matrix element M2 because neither maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsBenchmark DAC3 HGC headroomMatrix element M2 headroomBenchmark DAC3 HGC hissMatrix element M2 hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+40 dB+39 dB dampingnot publishednot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+20 dB+19 dB dampingnot publishednot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+28 dB+29 dB dampingnot publishednot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+24 dB+27 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+21 dB+21 dB dampingnot publishednot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+17 dB+21 dBnot publishednot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+13 dB+16 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+11 dB+12 dB dampingnot publishednot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The Matrix element M2 costs $600 more than the Benchmark DAC3 HGC, and on these three axes the money buys nothing: among the 567 models here there is not one that the Matrix element M2 handles and the Benchmark DAC3 HGC does not — not on power, not on the one-eighth rule, not on hiss. The traffic runs the other way: the cheaper Benchmark DAC3 HGC leaves 520 models alone under the one-eighth rule that the Matrix element M2 does not.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

↑