Benchmark HPA4 vs McIntosh MHA200

Short answer

  • More power: the Benchmark HPA4, with 3.35 W into 32 Ω; the McIntosh MHA200 has 500 mW. The Benchmark HPA4 drives 1 headphone to 100 dB that the McIntosh MHA200 cannot (Symphonium Titan).
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — the maker of the McIntosh MHA200 publishes no noise figure.
  • Price: the Benchmark HPA4 costs $499 more; what that buys on these numbers is set out further down, under What the price difference buys.

Both are desktop amplifiers, $3499 against $3000.

The Benchmark HPA4 reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here, the McIntosh MHA200 on 566.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationBenchmark HPA4McIntosh MHA200
Power into 32Ω3.4 W500 mW
Power into 150Ω829 mW475 mW
Power into 300Ω440 mW485 mW
Power into 600Ω220 mW500 mW
Output impedance<0.1 Ωnot published
Output noise2.45 µVnot published
Price$3499$3000
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
567566

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

The 4.4 mm or XLR socket, rated on its own

BalancedBenchmark HPA4McIntosh MHA200
Socketbalancedno separate rating
Power into 32Ω3.4 W derived—
Power into 300Ω440 mW—
Output impedance<0.1 Ω—
Output noise2.45 µV—
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
567—

Only the Benchmark HPA4 has a separate balanced rating from its maker; through it, it reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here. The McIntosh MHA200 may still have a balanced socket — its spec sheet simply gives no figure for one, so there is nothing to put beside it. Derived figures are worked out from the loads the maker did publish.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadBenchmark HPA4McIntosh MHA200
32 ΩDerivedPublished
150 ΩDerivedDerived
300 ΩPublishedDerived
600 ΩDerivedPublished

Both makers publish a power rating. Benchmark HPA4 publishes at 300 Ω; McIntosh MHA200 at 32 Ω and at 600 Ω. The other rows are worked out from those.

So the two columns are not equally firm row by row: at 300 Ω only the Benchmark HPA4 figure is the maker’s own and at 32 Ω and at 600 Ω only the McIntosh MHA200 figure is the maker’s own. On those rows the derived number is the one to doubt first.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

1 headphone reaches 100 dB on the Benchmark HPA4 but not on the McIntosh MHA200 — Symphonium Titan.

566 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Shure SE846: Benchmark HPA4 has +49 dB of headroom there against +35 dB. 14 dB is about 24 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for McIntosh MHA200 because that maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsBenchmark HPA4 headroomMcIntosh MHA200 headroomBenchmark HPA4 hissMcIntosh MHA200 hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+49 dB+35 dB22 dBnot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+29 dB+15 dB2 dBnot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+33 dB+28 dB0 dBnot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+29 dB+29 dB-4 dBnot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+27 dB+17 dB-5 dBnot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+22 dB+25 dB-11 dBnot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+18 dB+19 dB-15 dBnot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+16 dB+10 dB-17 dBnot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The Benchmark HPA4 costs $499 more than the McIntosh MHA200. Out of the 567 models here, that difference buys 1 more model driven to 100 dB.

Nothing runs the other way: there is no axis here on which the cheaper of the two does better.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

Each in full: Benchmark HPA4 and McIntosh MHA200.

↑