Bottlehead Crack (OTL kit) vs iFi iCAN Pro

Short answer

  • More power: the iFi iCAN Pro, with 4.00 W into 32 Ω; the Bottlehead Crack (OTL kit) has 271 mW. The iFi iCAN Pro drives 2 headphones to 100 dB that the Bottlehead Crack (OTL kit) cannot (Moondrop PARA, Symphonium Titan).
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — the maker of the Bottlehead Crack (OTL kit) publishes no noise figure.
  • Price: the iFi iCAN Pro costs $225 more; what that buys on these numbers is set out further down, under What the price difference buys.

Both are desktop amplifiers, $375 against $600.

The iFi iCAN Pro reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here, the Bottlehead Crack (OTL kit) on 565.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationBottlehead Crack (OTL kit)iFi iCAN Pro
Power into 32Ω271 mW4.0 W
Power into 150Ω403 mW1.2 W
Power into 300Ω333 mW600 mW
Power into 600Ω227 mW300 mW
Output impedance120.0 Ω0.5 Ω unverified
Output noisenot published25 µV unverified
Price$375$600
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
565567

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadBottlehead Crack (OTL kit)iFi iCAN Pro
32 ΩDerivedUnverified
150 ΩDerivedUnverified
300 ΩPublishedUnverified
600 ΩDerivedUnverified

iFi iCAN Pro publishes no electrical specification at all. That is true of 10 of the 280 sources here, and the figures in that column come from independent measurement rather than from a maker document — which is not worse, but it is not the same thing, and it cannot be checked against anything the maker will stand behind.

The Bottlehead Crack (OTL kit) column does stand on a power rating its maker printed, at one of these four loads at least. Reading the two straight across sets one kind of claim against another, and nobody has written down the conditions of both side by side.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

2 headphones reach 100 dB on the iFi iCAN Pro but not on the Bottlehead Crack (OTL kit) — Moondrop PARA, Symphonium Titan.

565 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Campfire Audio Andromeda 2020: iFi iCAN Pro has +25 dB of headroom there against +13 dB. 12 dB is about 15 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for Bottlehead Crack (OTL kit) and iFi iCAN Pro because neither maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsBottlehead Crack (OTL kit) headroomiFi iCAN Pro headroomBottlehead Crack (OTL kit) hissiFi iCAN Pro hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+33 dB damping+45 dBnot publishednot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+13 dB damping+25 dBnot publishednot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+26 dB damping+34 dBnot publishednot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+27 dB damping+31 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+14 dB damping+26 dBnot publishednot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+22 dB damping+24 dBnot publishednot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+17 dB damping+20 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+7 dB damping+17 dBnot publishednot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The iFi iCAN Pro costs $225 more than the Bottlehead Crack (OTL kit). Out of the 567 models here, that difference buys 2 more models driven to 100 dB.

Nothing runs the other way: there is no axis here on which the cheaper of the two does better.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

Each has a page of its own with a full headphone list and the provenance of every figure — worth opening here, because iFi iCAN Pro has published no electrical specification at all and everything above comes from independent measurement: Bottlehead Crack (OTL kit) and iFi iCAN Pro.

↑