Bryston BHA-1 vs Wells Audio Milo

Short answer

  • More power: the Wells Audio Milo, with 12.00 W into 32 Ω; the Bryston BHA-1 has 500 mW. The Wells Audio Milo drives 1 headphone to 100 dB that the Bryston BHA-1 cannot (Symphonium Titan).
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — the maker of the Bryston BHA-1 publishes no noise figure.
  • Price: the Wells Audio Milo costs $695 less, and wherever both makers publish a figure the Bryston BHA-1 shows no advantage for the extra money.

Both are desktop amplifiers, $2395 against $1700.

The Wells Audio Milo reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here, the Bryston BHA-1 on 566.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationBryston BHA-1Wells Audio Milo
Power into 32Ω500 mW12.0 W
Power into 150Ω358 mW3.1 W
Power into 300Ω445 mW1.5 W
Power into 600Ω667 mW767 mW
Output impedancenot published0.1 Ω
Output noisenot published1.5 µV unverified
Price$2395$1700
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
566567

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

The 4.4 mm or XLR socket, rated on its own

BalancedBryston BHA-1Wells Audio Milo
Socketbalancedno separate rating
Power into 32Ω500 mW—
Power into 300Ω445 mW derived—
Output impedancenot published—
Output noisenot published—
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
566—

Only the Bryston BHA-1 has a separate balanced rating from its maker; through it, it reaches 100 dB on 566 of the 567 models here. The Wells Audio Milo may still have a balanced socket — its spec sheet simply gives no figure for one, so there is nothing to put beside it. Derived figures are worked out from the loads the maker did publish.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadBryston BHA-1Wells Audio Milo
32 ΩPublishedPublished
150 ΩDerivedDerived
300 ΩDerivedDerived
600 ΩPublishedDerived

Both makers publish a power rating. Bryston BHA-1 publishes at 32 Ω and at 600 Ω; Wells Audio Milo at 32 Ω. The other rows are worked out from those.

So the two columns are not equally firm row by row: at 600 Ω only the Bryston BHA-1 figure is the maker’s own. On those rows the derived number is the one to doubt first.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

1 headphone reaches 100 dB on the Wells Audio Milo but not on the Bryston BHA-1 — Symphonium Titan.

566 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Shure SE846: Wells Audio Milo has +49 dB of headroom there against +35 dB. 14 dB is about 24 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for Bryston BHA-1 and Wells Audio Milo because neither maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsBryston BHA-1 headroomWells Audio Milo headroomBryston BHA-1 hissWells Audio Milo hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+35 dB+49 dBnot publishednot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+15 dB+29 dBnot publishednot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+27 dB+39 dBnot publishednot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+28 dB+35 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+17 dB+31 dBnot publishednot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+26 dB+28 dBnot publishednot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+18 dB+24 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+9 dB+22 dBnot publishednot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The Bryston BHA-1 costs $695 more than the Wells Audio Milo, and on these three axes the money buys nothing: among the 567 models here there is not one that the Bryston BHA-1 handles and the Wells Audio Milo does not — not on power, not on the one-eighth rule, not on hiss. The traffic runs the other way: the cheaper Wells Audio Milo drives one model to 100 dB that the Bryston BHA-1 does not.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

Each in full: Bryston BHA-1 and Wells Audio Milo.

↑