Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M vs HiFiMAN EF500

Short answer

  • More power: the HiFiMAN EF500, with 1.32 W into 32 Ω; the Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M has 300 mW. The HiFiMAN EF500 drives 2 headphones to 100 dB that the Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M cannot (Moondrop PARA, Symphonium Titan).
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — neither maker publishes a noise figure.
  • Price: the HiFiMAN EF500 costs $60 more; what that buys on these numbers is set out further down, under What the price difference buys.

Both are desktop DAC/amps, $399 against $459.

The HiFiMAN EF500 reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here, the Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M on 565.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationCambridge Audio DacMagic 200MHiFiMAN EF500
Power into 32Ω300 mW1.3 W
Power into 150Ω65 mW282 mW
Power into 300Ω32 mW141 mW
Power into 600Ω16 mW70 mW
Output impedancenot publishednot published
Output noisenot publishednot published
Price$399$459
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
565567

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

The 4.4 mm or XLR socket, rated on its own

BalancedCambridge Audio DacMagic 200MHiFiMAN EF500
Socketno separate ratingXLR4
Power into 32Ω—4.5 W
Power into 300Ω—480 mW derived
Output impedance—not published
Output noise—not published
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
—567

Only the HiFiMAN EF500 has a separate balanced rating from its maker; through it, it reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here. The Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M may still have a balanced socket — its spec sheet simply gives no figure for one, so there is nothing to put beside it. Derived figures are worked out from the loads the maker did publish.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadCambridge Audio DacMagic 200MHiFiMAN EF500
32 ΩPublishedPublished
150 ΩPublishedDerived
300 ΩDerivedDerived
600 ΩDerivedDerived

Both makers publish a power rating. Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M publishes at 32 Ω and at 150 Ω; HiFiMAN EF500 at 32 Ω. The other rows are worked out from those.

So the two columns are not equally firm row by row: at 150 Ω only the Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M figure is the maker’s own. On those rows the derived number is the one to doubt first.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

2 headphones reach 100 dB on the HiFiMAN EF500 but not on the Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M — Moondrop PARA, Symphonium Titan.

565 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Shure SE846: HiFiMAN EF500 has +40 dB of headroom there against +33 dB. 6 dB is about 4.4 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M and HiFiMAN EF500 because neither maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsCambridge Audio DacMagic 200M headroomHiFiMAN EF500 headroomCambridge Audio DacMagic 200M hissHiFiMAN EF500 hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+33 dB+40 dBnot publishednot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+13 dB+20 dBnot publishednot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+22 dB+29 dBnot publishednot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+18 dB+24 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+15 dB+21 dBnot publishednot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+11 dB+18 dBnot publishednot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+7 dB+13 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+5 dB+11 dBnot publishednot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The HiFiMAN EF500 costs $60 more than the Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M. Out of the 567 models here, that difference buys 2 more models driven to 100 dB.

Nothing runs the other way: there is no axis here on which the cheaper of the two does better.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

↑