EarMen Colibri vs EPZ TP50

Short answer

  • More power: the EPZ TP50, with 121 mW into 32 Ω; the EarMen Colibri has 75 mW. Through the balanced sockets it is the other way round: the EarMen Colibri has 280 mW against 240 mW. The EarMen Colibri drives 4 headphones to 100 dB that the EPZ TP50 cannot (Moondrop COSMO, Symphonium Crimson, Symphonium Helios, 1 more). The EPZ TP50 drives 2 headphones to 100 dB that the EarMen Colibri cannot (HiFiMAN Susvara, Moondrop SKYLAND).
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — the maker of the EarMen Colibri publishes no noise figure.
  • Price: the EarMen Colibri costs $89 more; what that buys on these numbers is set out further down, under What the price difference buys.

Both are dongles, $299 against $210.

The EarMen Colibri reaches 100 dB on 563 of the 567 models here, the EPZ TP50 on 561.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationEarMen ColibriEPZ TP50
Power into 32Ω75 mW121 mW
Power into 150Ω16 mW26 mW
Power into 300Ω8.0 mW13 mW
Power into 600Ω4.0 mW6.5 mW
Output impedancenot publishednot published
Output noisenot published1.0 µV
Price$299$210
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
563561

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

The 4.4 mm or XLR socket, rated on its own

BalancedEarMen ColibriEPZ TP50
Socket4.4mm4.4mm
Power into 32Ω280 mW240 mW
Power into 300Ω30 mW derived26 mW derived
Output impedancenot publishednot published
Output noisenot published1.0 µV
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
565565

Through the balanced sockets the two are level on the same test: each reaches 100 dB on 565 of the 567 models here. Derived figures are worked out from the loads the maker did publish.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadEarMen ColibriEPZ TP50
32 ΩPublishedPublished
150 ΩDerivedDerived
300 ΩDerivedDerived
600 ΩDerivedDerived

Both makers publish a power rating. EarMen Colibri publishes at 32 Ω; EPZ TP50 at 32 Ω. The other rows are worked out from those.

The two publish at the same loads, which is the one case where the rows of this table can be read straight across.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

4 headphones reach 100 dB on the EarMen Colibri but not on the EPZ TP50 — Moondrop COSMO, Symphonium Crimson, Symphonium Helios, 1 more.

2 headphones reach 100 dB on the EPZ TP50 but not on the EarMen Colibri — HiFiMAN Susvara, Moondrop SKYLAND.

559 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Campfire Audio Andromeda 2020: EarMen Colibri has +13 dB of headroom there against +9 dB. 4 dB is about 2.5 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for EarMen Colibri because that maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsEarMen Colibri headroomEPZ TP50 headroomEarMen Colibri hissEPZ TP50 hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+33 dB+29 dBnot published14 dB
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+13 dB+9 dBnot published-6 dB
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+16 dB+18 dBnot published-7 dB
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+12 dB+14 dBnot published-12 dB
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+11 dB+11 dBnot published-13 dB
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+5 dB+7 dBnot published-19 dB
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+1 dB+3 dBnot published-23 dB
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW-1 dB+1 dBnot published-25 dB

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The EarMen Colibri costs $89 more than the EPZ TP50. Out of the 567 models here, that difference buys 4 more models driven to 100 dB.

It does not run one way only: the cheaper EPZ TP50 drives 2 models to 100 dB that the EarMen Colibri does not, which is the part worth checking against your own headphones before paying the difference.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

Each in full: EarMen Colibri and EPZ TP50.

↑