Ferrum ERCO vs Questyle CMA18 Master

Short answer

  • More power: the Questyle CMA18 Master, with 1.50 W into 32 Ω; the Ferrum ERCO has 1.09 W. Through the balanced sockets it is the other way round: the Ferrum ERCO has 3.90 W against 2.00 W. The Questyle CMA18 Master drives 1 headphone to 100 dB that the Ferrum ERCO cannot (Symphonium Titan).
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — neither maker publishes a noise figure.
  • Price: the Questyle CMA18 Master costs $51 less, and wherever both makers publish a figure the Ferrum ERCO shows no advantage for the extra money.

Both are desktop DAC/amps, $2050 against $1999.

The Questyle CMA18 Master reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here, the Ferrum ERCO on 566.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationFerrum ERCOQuestyle CMA18 Master
Power into 32Ω1.1 W1.5 W
Power into 150Ω580 mW344 mW
Power into 300Ω300 mW188 mW
Power into 600Ω150 mW94 mW
Output impedance0.3 Ωnot published
Output noisenot publishednot published
Price$2050$1999
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
566567

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

The 4.4 mm or XLR socket, rated on its own

BalancedFerrum ERCOQuestyle CMA18 Master
Socket4-pin XLR4.4mm + 4-pin XLR
Power into 32Ω3.9 W derived2.0 W
Power into 300Ω1.2 W765 mW
Output impedance0.3 Ωnot published
Output noisenot publishednot published
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
567567

Through the balanced sockets the two are level on the same test: each reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here. Derived figures are worked out from the loads the maker did publish.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadFerrum ERCOQuestyle CMA18 Master
32 ΩDerivedPublished
150 ΩDerivedDerived
300 ΩPublishedPublished
600 ΩDerivedDerived

Both makers publish a power rating. Ferrum ERCO publishes at 300 Ω; Questyle CMA18 Master at 32 Ω and at 300 Ω. The other rows are worked out from those.

So the two columns are not equally firm row by row: at 32 Ω only the Questyle CMA18 Master figure is the maker’s own. On those rows the derived number is the one to doubt first.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

1 headphone reaches 100 dB on the Questyle CMA18 Master but not on the Ferrum ERCO — Symphonium Titan.

566 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the HiFiMAN Susvara: Ferrum ERCO has +15 dB of headroom there against +12 dB. 2 dB is about 1.7 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for Ferrum ERCO and Questyle CMA18 Master because neither maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsFerrum ERCO headroomQuestyle CMA18 Master headroomFerrum ERCO hissQuestyle CMA18 Master hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+39 dB+40 dBnot publishednot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+19 dB+20 dBnot publishednot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+32 dB+29 dBnot publishednot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+28 dB+25 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+20 dB+22 dBnot publishednot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+21 dB+19 dBnot publishednot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+17 dB+15 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+15 dB+12 dBnot publishednot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The Ferrum ERCO costs $51 more than the Questyle CMA18 Master, and on these three axes the money buys nothing: among the 567 models here there is not one that the Ferrum ERCO handles and the Questyle CMA18 Master does not — not on power, not on the one-eighth rule, not on hiss. The traffic runs the other way: the cheaper Questyle CMA18 Master drives one model to 100 dB that the Ferrum ERCO does not.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

↑