FiiO K17 vs FiiO K9 Pro

Short answer

  • Power: about the same. The FiiO K17 has 1.85 W into 32 Ω, the FiiO K9 Pro 2.00 W (balanced: 4.00 W and 2.00 W). Both drive 567 of the 567 non-electrostatic headphones here to 100 dB, so on that test the difference changes nothing.
  • Quieter with sensitive IEMs: the FiiO K9 Pro. 55 headphones stay below audible hiss on it but not on the FiiO K17 (64 Audio Nio, 64 Audio U12t, 64 Audio U18s, 52 more).
  • Price: the FiiO K9 Pro costs $191 less and gives up nothing on power, output impedance or hiss against the 567 headphones here. Whatever the extra money for the FiiO K17 buys, it is not these three numbers.

Both are desktop DAC/amps, $990 against $799.

On raw power they are level: each reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 non-electrostatic models here.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationFiiO K17FiiO K9 Pro
Power into 32Ω1.9 W2.0 W
Power into 150Ω431 mW482 mW
Power into 300Ω240 mW278 mW
Power into 600Ω120 mW139 mW
Output impedance1.0 Ω1.0 Ω
Output noise5.0 µV2.0 µV
Price$990$799
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
567567

The 4.4 mm or XLR socket, rated on its own

BalancedFiiO K17FiiO K9 Pro
Socket4.4mm / XLR44.4mm + XLR4
Power into 32Ω4.0 W2.0 W
Power into 300Ω950 mW1.1 W
Output impedance1.5 Ω1.0 Ω
Output noise7.9 µV3.0 µV
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
567567

Through the balanced sockets the two are level on the same test: each reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadFiiO K17FiiO K9 Pro
32 ΩPublishedPublished
150 ΩDerivedDerived
300 ΩPublishedPublished
600 ΩDerivedDerived

Both makers publish a power rating. FiiO K17 publishes at 32 Ω and at 300 Ω; FiiO K9 Pro at 32 Ω and at 300 Ω. The other rows are worked out from those.

The two publish at the same loads, which is the one case where the rows of this table can be read straight across.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

On power they are interchangeable across this whole database: there is no headphone here that one reaches 100 dB on and the other does not.

55 headphones stay below the audible-hiss threshold on the FiiO K9 Pro but cross it on the FiiO K17 (64 Audio Nio, 64 Audio U12t, 64 Audio U18s, 52 more).

567 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Shure SE846: FiiO K17 has +44 dB of headroom there against +42 dB. 2 dB is about 1.6 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

Hiss below about 20 dB SPL is inaudible in a quiet room.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsFiiO K17 headroomFiiO K9 Pro headroomFiiO K17 hissFiiO K9 Pro hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+44 dB+42 dB28 dB20 dB
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+24 dB+22 dB8 dB0 dB
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+30 dB+31 dB7 dB-1 dB
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+26 dB+27 dB2 dB-6 dB
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+24 dB+23 dB1 dB-7 dB
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+20 dB+20 dB-5 dB-13 dB
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+16 dB+16 dB-9 dB-17 dB
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+13 dB+13 dB-11 dB-19 dB

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The FiiO K17 costs $191 more than the FiiO K9 Pro, and on these three axes the money buys nothing: among the 567 models here there is not one that the FiiO K17 handles and the FiiO K9 Pro does not — not on power, not on the one-eighth rule, not on hiss. The traffic runs the other way: the cheaper FiiO K9 Pro keeps 55 models below the audible-hiss threshold that the FiiO K17 does not.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

Each in full: FiiO K17 and FiiO K9 Pro.

↑