FiiO M11S vs Shanling M3 Ultra

Both are portable players, $499 against $479. This page puts them side by side on the only three things a maker can be held to — power, output impedance and noise — and then asks the question that actually matters: which headphones do they treat differently?

The FiiO M11S reaches 100 dB on 566 of the 567 models here, the Shanling M3 Ultra on 562.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationFiiO M11SShanling M3 Ultra
Power into 32Ω200 mW140 mW
Power into 150Ω44 mW30 mW
Power into 300Ω23 mW15 mW
Power into 600Ω12 mW7.5 mW
Output impedance1.5 Ω1 Ω
Output noise1.8 µVnot published
Price$499$479
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
566562

A figure marked not published is missing from the maker’s own material, which is not the same as being good or bad. Where one of these two publishes a number and the other does not, the comparison on that axis cannot be made at all — and saying so is more useful than guessing.

The headphones that tell them apart

4 headphones reach 100 dB on the FiiO M11S but not on the Shanling M3 Ultra — Moondrop COSMO, Moondrop PARA, Symphonium Crimson, 1 more.

36 headphones are left alone by the Shanling M3 Ultra under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the FiiO M11S (64 Audio Aspire 1, 64 Audio Fourte, 64 Audio Ocean, 33 more).

562 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both. That is a power count and nothing more; whether either source suits a given headphone also depends on the two lines above.

Both pages in full

Each has a page of its own with every power figure traced to what the maker published and a full headphone list: FiiO M11S and Shanling M3 Ultra. Or put either against your own headphones in the source comparison tool.