FiiO M17 vs iBasso DX320

Both are portable players, $1799 against $1599. This page puts them side by side on the only three things a maker can be held to — power, output impedance and noise — and then asks the question that actually matters: which headphones do they treat differently?

The FiiO M17 reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here, the iBasso DX320 on 565.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationFiiO M17iBasso DX320
Power into 32Ω500 mW380 mW
Power into 150Ω115 mW81 mW
Power into 300Ω63 mW40 mW
Power into 600Ω32 mW20 mW
Output impedance1 Ω0.34 Ω
Output noise3.5 µVnot published
Price$1799$1599
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
567565

A figure marked not published is missing from the maker’s own material, which is not the same as being good or bad. Where one of these two publishes a number and the other does not, the comparison on that axis cannot be made at all — and saying so is more useful than guessing.

The headphones that tell them apart

2 headphones reach 100 dB on the FiiO M17 but not on the iBasso DX320 — Moondrop PARA, Symphonium Titan.

15 headphones are left alone by the iBasso DX320 under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the FiiO M17 (64 Audio Nio, 64 Audio Volur, Campfire Audio Andromeda 2023, 12 more).

565 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both. That is a power count and nothing more; whether either source suits a given headphone also depends on the two lines above.

Both pages in full

Each has a page of its own with every power figure traced to what the maker published and a full headphone list: FiiO M17 and iBasso DX320. Or put either against your own headphones in the source comparison tool.