Focusrite Scarlett 16i16 (4th Gen) vs Zoom UAC-232

Both are audio interfaces, $410 against $399. This page puts them side by side on the only three things a maker can be held to — power, output impedance and noise — and then asks the question that actually matters: which headphones do they treat differently?

The Zoom UAC-232 reaches 100 dB on 563 of the 567 models here, the Focusrite Scarlett 16i16 (4th Gen) on 553.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationFocusrite Scarlett 16i16 (4th Gen)Zoom UAC-232
Power into 32Ω55 mW148 mW
Power into 150Ω27 mW51 mW
Power into 300Ω27 mW28 mW
Power into 600Ω14 mW14 mW
Output impedance11 Ω12 Ω
Output noisenot publishednot published
Price$410$399
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
553563

A figure marked not published is missing from the maker’s own material, which is not the same as being good or bad. Where one of these two publishes a number and the other does not, the comparison on that axis cannot be made at all — and saying so is more useful than guessing.

The headphones that tell them apart

10 headphones reach 100 dB on the Zoom UAC-232 but not on the Focusrite Scarlett 16i16 (4th Gen) — HiFiMAN HE-6se V2, HiFiMAN HE6 Remastered, HiFiMAN Susvara, 7 more.

553 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both. That is a power count and nothing more; whether either source suits a given headphone also depends on the two lines above.

Both pages in full

Each has a page of its own with every power figure traced to what the maker published and a full headphone list: Focusrite Scarlett 16i16 (4th Gen) and Zoom UAC-232. Or put either against your own headphones in the source comparison tool.