Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 4th gen vs Steinberg UR24C

Short answer

  • More power: the Steinberg UR24C, with 80 mW into 32 Ω; the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 4th gen has 31 mW. The Steinberg UR24C drives 6 headphones to 100 dB that the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 4th gen cannot (HiFiMAN HE-6se V2, HiFiMAN HE6 Remastered, HiFiMAN Susvara, 3 more).
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — neither maker publishes a noise figure.
  • Price: the Steinberg UR24C costs $5 less, and wherever both makers publish a figure the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 4th gen shows no advantage for the extra money.

Both are audio interfaces, $199 against $194.

The Steinberg UR24C reaches 100 dB on 558 of the 567 models here, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 4th gen on 552.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationFocusrite Scarlett 2i2 4th genSteinberg UR24C
Power into 32Ω31 mW80 mW
Power into 150Ω19 mW27 mW
Power into 300Ω22 mW13 mW
Power into 600Ω11 mW6.7 mW
Output impedance50 Ωnot published
Output noisenot publishednot published
Price$199$194
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
552558

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadFocusrite Scarlett 2i2 4th genSteinberg UR24C
32 ΩDerivedDerived
150 ΩDerivedDerived
300 ΩPublishedDerived
600 ΩDerivedDerived

Only one of these two columns starts from a power rating. Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 4th gen publishes one at 300 Ω; Steinberg UR24C publishes none at any of these four loads, so its column is worked out from power it published at other loads. Both are arithmetic on a maker’s own figures rather than guesses, and the method used for the Steinberg UR24C understates rather than flatters — but at 300 Ω is the only load here at which its maker can be held to a figure.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

6 headphones reach 100 dB on the Steinberg UR24C but not on the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 4th gen — HiFiMAN HE-6se V2, HiFiMAN HE6 Remastered, HiFiMAN Susvara, 3 more.

552 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the HiFiMAN Susvara: Steinberg UR24C has +1 dB of headroom there against -3 dB. 5 dB is about 2.9 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 4th gen and Steinberg UR24C because neither maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsFocusrite Scarlett 2i2 4th gen headroomSteinberg UR24C headroomFocusrite Scarlett 2i2 4th gen hissSteinberg UR24C hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+23 dB damping+28 dBnot publishednot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+3 dB damping+8 dBnot publishednot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+14 dB damping+19 dBnot publishednot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+15 dB damping+14 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+5 dB damping+9 dBnot publishednot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+9 dB+7 dBnot publishednot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+5 dB damping+3 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW-3 dB damping+1 dBnot publishednot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 4th gen costs $5 more than the Steinberg UR24C, and on these three axes the money buys nothing: among the 567 models here there is not one that the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 4th gen handles and the Steinberg UR24C does not — not on power, not on the one-eighth rule, not on hiss. The traffic runs the other way: the cheaper Steinberg UR24C drives 6 models to 100 dB that the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 4th gen does not.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

↑