Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th gen vs Zoom AMS-22

Both are audio interfaces, $139 against $100. This page puts them side by side on the only three things a maker can be held to — power, output impedance and noise — and then asks the question that actually matters: which headphones do they treat differently?

The Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th gen reaches 100 dB on 552 of the 567 models here, the Zoom AMS-22 on 538.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationFocusrite Scarlett Solo 4th genZoom AMS-22
Power into 32Ω31 mW20 mW
Power into 150Ω19 mW6.5 mW
Power into 300Ω22 mW3.4 mW
Power into 600Ω11 mW1.8 mW
Output impedance50 Ω10 Ω
Output noisenot publishednot published
Price$139$100
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
552538

A figure marked not published is missing from the maker’s own material, which is not the same as being good or bad. Where one of these two publishes a number and the other does not, the comparison on that axis cannot be made at all — and saying so is more useful than guessing.

The headphones that tell them apart

14 headphones reach 100 dB on the Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th gen but not on the Zoom AMS-22 — Abyss AB-1266 Phi TC, Audeze LCD-5, Beyerdynamic DT 880 Edition (600Ω), 11 more.

51 headphones are left alone by the Zoom AMS-22 under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th gen (AKG K612 Pro, Audeze LCD-3, Audeze LCD-4, 48 more).

538 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both. That is a power count and nothing more; whether either source suits a given headphone also depends on the two lines above.

Both pages in full

Each has a page of its own with every power figure traced to what the maker published and a full headphone list: Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th gen and Zoom AMS-22. Or put either against your own headphones in the source comparison tool.