Hidizs AP80 Pro Max vs Shanling M1 Plus

Short answer

  • More power: the Shanling M1 Plus, with 195 mW into 32 Ω; the Hidizs AP80 Pro Max has 70 mW (balanced: 660 mW against 190 mW). The Shanling M1 Plus drives 8 headphones to 100 dB that the Hidizs AP80 Pro Max cannot (HiFiMAN Susvara, Moondrop COSMO, Moondrop PARA 2, 5 more).
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — neither maker publishes a noise figure.
  • Price: the Shanling M1 Plus costs $30 more; what that buys on these numbers is set out further down, under What the price difference buys.

Both are portable players, $179 against $209.

The Shanling M1 Plus reaches 100 dB on 564 of the 567 models here, the Hidizs AP80 Pro Max on 556.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationHidizs AP80 Pro MaxShanling M1 Plus
Power into 32Ω70 mW195 mW
Power into 150Ω15 mW42 mW
Power into 300Ω7.5 mW21 mW
Power into 600Ω3.7 mW10 mW
Output impedancenot published0.6 Ω
Output noisenot publishednot published
Price$179$209
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
556564

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

The 4.4 mm or XLR socket, rated on its own

BalancedHidizs AP80 Pro MaxShanling M1 Plus
Socket4.4mm4.4mm
Power into 32Ω190 mW660 mW
Power into 300Ω20 mW derived70 mW derived
Output impedancenot published1.2 Ω
Output noisenot publishednot published
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
564566

Through the balanced sockets the Shanling M1 Plus reaches 100 dB on 566 of the 567 models here and the Hidizs AP80 Pro Max on 564. Derived figures are worked out from the loads the maker did publish.

Everything else the two makers publish

As publishedHidizs AP80 Pro MaxShanling M1 Plus
DACDual ESS ES9219CESS ES9069Q
ProcessorX1600EIngenic X2000
Operating systemHiByOSMTouch (Shanling's own system)
StoragemicroSD up to 2 TB (internal storage not stated)microSD card slot (internal storage not stated)
Outputs3.5 mm SE (70 mW + 70 mW @ 32 Ω), 4.4 mm balanced (190 mW + 190 mW @ 32 Ω)3.5 mm single-ended, 4.4 mm balanced, USB-C; 3.5 mm coaxial S/PDIF out
BluetoothBidirectional Bluetooth 5.1: LDAC, aptX, AAC, SBC, UATBluetooth 5.2, bidirectional: LDAC, aptX HD, aptX, AAC
Wi-Fi2.4 GHz Wi-Fi (Tidal, Qobuz, DLNA, AirPlay)2.4 / 5 GHz, DLNA, AirPlay, OTA updates
FormatsPCM 32bit/384kHz, native DSD256PCM 32 bit / 768 kHz, DSD512
Screen2.95-inch, 360 x 640, touchscreen3.2-inch, 320 x 480, touchscreen
Battery1300 mAh2100 mAh
Battery lifeUp to 12 h continuous playback (no test condition given)Up to 12.5 h (no test condition given)
Weightnot published116 g
Dimensions3.25 x 2.00 x 0.62 in (published in inches only)86 x 61 x 17 mm

Copied from the makers’ own pages: hidizs.net/products/hidizs-ap80-pro-max-all-in-one-hi-res-streaming-music-player, en.shanling.com/article-IntroM1Plus.html. Battery life is the maker’s own test figure.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadHidizs AP80 Pro MaxShanling M1 Plus
32 ΩPublishedPublished
150 ΩDerivedDerived
300 ΩDerivedDerived
600 ΩDerivedDerived

Both makers publish a power rating. Hidizs AP80 Pro Max publishes at 32 Ω; Shanling M1 Plus at 32 Ω. The other rows are worked out from those.

The two publish at the same loads, which is the one case where the rows of this table can be read straight across.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

8 headphones reach 100 dB on the Shanling M1 Plus but not on the Hidizs AP80 Pro Max — HiFiMAN Susvara, Moondrop COSMO, Moondrop PARA 2, 5 more.

556 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Audio-Technica ATH-R70X: Shanling M1 Plus has +9 dB of headroom there against +5 dB. 4 dB is about 2.8 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for Hidizs AP80 Pro Max and Shanling M1 Plus because neither maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsHidizs AP80 Pro Max headroomShanling M1 Plus headroomHidizs AP80 Pro Max hissShanling M1 Plus hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+27 dB+31 dBnot publishednot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+7 dB+11 dBnot publishednot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+16 dB+21 dBnot publishednot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+12 dB+16 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+8 dB+13 dBnot publishednot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+5 dB+9 dBnot publishednot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+1 dB+5 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW-1 dB+3 dBnot publishednot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The Shanling M1 Plus costs $30 more than the Hidizs AP80 Pro Max. Out of the 567 models here, that difference buys 8 more models driven to 100 dB.

Nothing runs the other way: there is no axis here on which the cheaper of the two does better.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

↑