iBasso DX180 vs Shanling M3 Ultra

Short answer

  • More power: the iBasso DX180, with 262 mW into 32 Ω; the Shanling M3 Ultra has 140 mW (balanced: 690 mW against 260 mW). The iBasso DX180 drives 4 headphones to 100 dB that the Shanling M3 Ultra cannot (Moondrop COSMO, Moondrop PARA, Symphonium Crimson, 1 more).
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — neither maker publishes a noise figure.
  • Output impedance: 14 headphones are left alone by the iBasso DX180 under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the Shanling M3 Ultra (64 Audio Nio, 64 Audio Volur, Campfire Audio Andromeda 2023, 11 more).
  • Price: the iBasso DX180 costs $1 more; what that buys on these numbers is set out further down, under What the price difference buys.

Both are portable players, $480 against $479.

The iBasso DX180 reaches 100 dB on 566 of the 567 models here, the Shanling M3 Ultra on 562.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationiBasso DX180Shanling M3 Ultra
Power into 32Ω262 mW140 mW
Power into 150Ω56 mW30 mW
Power into 300Ω28 mW15 mW
Power into 600Ω14 mW7.5 mW
Output impedance0.6 Ω1 Ω
Output noisenot publishednot published
Price$480$479
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
566562

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

The 4.4 mm or XLR socket, rated on its own

BalancediBasso DX180Shanling M3 Ultra
Socket4.4mm4.4mm
Power into 32Ω690 mW260 mW
Power into 300Ω74 mW derived28 mW derived
Output impedance1.1 Ω1 Ω
Output noisenot publishednot published
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
566565

Through the balanced sockets the iBasso DX180 reaches 100 dB on 566 of the 567 models here and the Shanling M3 Ultra on 565. Derived figures are worked out from the loads the maker did publish.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadiBasso DX180Shanling M3 Ultra
32 ΩDerivedPublished
150 ΩDerivedDerived
300 ΩDerivedDerived
600 ΩDerivedDerived

Only one of these two columns starts from a power rating. Shanling M3 Ultra publishes one at 32 Ω; iBasso DX180 publishes none at any of these four loads, so its column is worked out from power it published at other loads. Both are arithmetic on a maker’s own figures rather than guesses, and the method used for the iBasso DX180 understates rather than flatters — but at 32 Ω is the only load here at which its maker can be held to a figure.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

4 headphones reach 100 dB on the iBasso DX180 but not on the Shanling M3 Ultra — Moondrop COSMO, Moondrop PARA, Symphonium Crimson, 1 more.

14 headphones are left alone by the iBasso DX180 under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the Shanling M3 Ultra (64 Audio Nio, 64 Audio Volur, Campfire Audio Andromeda 2023, 11 more).

562 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Campfire Audio Andromeda 2020: iBasso DX180 has +19 dB of headroom there against +10 dB. 9 dB is about 7.5 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for iBasso DX180 and Shanling M3 Ultra because neither maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsiBasso DX180 headroomShanling M3 Ultra headroomiBasso DX180 hissShanling M3 Ultra hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+39 dB+30 dBnot publishednot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+19 dB+10 dBnot publishednot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+22 dB+19 dBnot publishednot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+17 dB+15 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+16 dB+11 dBnot publishednot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+11 dB+8 dBnot publishednot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+6 dB+4 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+4 dB+2 dBnot publishednot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The iBasso DX180 costs $1 more than the Shanling M3 Ultra. Out of the 567 models here, that difference buys 4 more models driven to 100 dB and 14 more models left alone under the one-eighth rule.

Nothing runs the other way: there is no axis here on which the cheaper of the two does better.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

Each in full: iBasso DX180 and Shanling M3 Ultra.

↑