iFi iCAN Pro vs Soncoz SGA1

Short answer

  • More power: the iFi iCAN Pro, with 4.00 W into 32 Ω; the Soncoz SGA1 has 407 mW. The iFi iCAN Pro drives 1 headphone to 100 dB that the Soncoz SGA1 cannot (Symphonium Titan).
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: no headphone here hisses audibly on one and not on the other.
  • Price: the same, $600.

Both are desktop amplifiers, both at $600.

The iFi iCAN Pro reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here, the Soncoz SGA1 on 566.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationiFi iCAN ProSoncoz SGA1
Power into 32Ω4.0 W407 mW
Power into 150Ω1.2 W207 mW
Power into 300Ω600 mW210 mW
Power into 600Ω300 mW105 mW
Output impedance0.5 Ω unverified0.1 Ω
Output noise25 µV unverified1.8 µV
Price$600$600
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
567566

The 4.4 mm or XLR socket, rated on its own

BalancediFi iCAN ProSoncoz SGA1
Socketno separate rating4-Pin XLR + 4.4mm
Power into 32Ω—407 mW derived
Power into 300Ω—840 mW
Output impedance—0.05 Ω
Output noise—3.6 µV
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
—566

Only the Soncoz SGA1 has a separate balanced rating from its maker; through it, it reaches 100 dB on 566 of the 567 models here. The iFi iCAN Pro may still have a balanced socket — its spec sheet simply gives no figure for one, so there is nothing to put beside it. Derived figures are worked out from the loads the maker did publish.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadiFi iCAN ProSoncoz SGA1
32 ΩUnverifiedDerived
150 ΩUnverifiedDerived
300 ΩUnverifiedPublished
600 ΩUnverifiedPublished

iFi iCAN Pro publishes no electrical specification at all. That is true of 10 of the 280 sources here, and the figures in that column come from independent measurement rather than from a maker document — which is not worse, but it is not the same thing, and it cannot be checked against anything the maker will stand behind.

The Soncoz SGA1 column does stand on a power rating its maker printed, at one of these four loads at least. Reading the two straight across sets one kind of claim against another, and nobody has written down the conditions of both side by side.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

1 headphone reaches 100 dB on the iFi iCAN Pro but not on the Soncoz SGA1 — Symphonium Titan.

566 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Campfire Audio Andromeda 2020: iFi iCAN Pro has +25 dB of headroom there against +15 dB. 10 dB is about 9.8 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for iFi iCAN Pro because that maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsiFi iCAN Pro headroomSoncoz SGA1 headroomiFi iCAN Pro hissSoncoz SGA1 hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+45 dB+35 dBnot published20 dB
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+25 dB+15 dBnot published-0 dB
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+34 dB+25 dBnot published-2 dB
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+31 dB+25 dBnot published-7 dB
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+26 dB+16 dBnot published-8 dB
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+24 dB+19 dBnot published-14 dB
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+20 dB+15 dBnot published-18 dB
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+17 dB+8 dBnot published-20 dB

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

These two cost the same, $600, so price settles nothing. Out of the 567 models here, the iFi iCAN Pro drives one model to 100 dB — and on the other side there is no such advantage at all.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

Each has a page of its own with a full headphone list and the provenance of every figure — worth opening here, because iFi iCAN Pro has published no electrical specification at all and everything above comes from independent measurement: iFi iCAN Pro and Soncoz SGA1.

↑