iFi Zen CAN vs Little Dot MK II

Short answer

  • More power: the iFi Zen CAN, with 1.60 W into 32 Ω; the Little Dot MK II has 100 mW. The iFi Zen CAN drives 7 headphones to 100 dB that the Little Dot MK II cannot (Moondrop COSMO, Moondrop PARA, Moondrop PARA 2, 4 more).
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — the maker of the Little Dot MK II publishes no noise figure.
  • Price: the iFi Zen CAN costs $23 more; what that buys on these numbers is set out further down, under What the price difference buys.

Both are desktop amplifiers, $199 against $176.

The iFi Zen CAN reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here, the Little Dot MK II on 560.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationiFi Zen CANLittle Dot MK II
Power into 32Ω1.6 W100 mW
Power into 150Ω375 mW214 mW
Power into 300Ω190 mW300 mW
Power into 600Ω98 mW150 mW
Output impedance0.5 Ω unverifiednot published
Output noise1.5 µV unverifiednot published
Price$199$176
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
567560

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

The 4.4 mm or XLR socket, rated on its own

BalancediFi Zen CANLittle Dot MK II
Socket4.4mmno separate rating
Power into 32Ω1.2 W—
Power into 300Ω550 mW derived—
Output impedancenot published—
Output noisenot published—
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
567—

Only the iFi Zen CAN has a separate balanced rating from its maker; through it, it reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here. The Little Dot MK II may still have a balanced socket — its spec sheet simply gives no figure for one, so there is nothing to put beside it. Derived figures are worked out from the loads the maker did publish.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadiFi Zen CANLittle Dot MK II
32 ΩPublishedPublished
150 ΩDerivedDerived
300 ΩDerivedPublished
600 ΩPublishedDerived

Both makers publish a power rating. iFi Zen CAN publishes at 32 Ω and at 600 Ω; Little Dot MK II at 32 Ω and at 300 Ω. The other rows are worked out from those.

So the two columns are not equally firm row by row: at 600 Ω only the iFi Zen CAN figure is the maker’s own and at 300 Ω only the Little Dot MK II figure is the maker’s own. On those rows the derived number is the one to doubt first.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

7 headphones reach 100 dB on the iFi Zen CAN but not on the Little Dot MK II — Moondrop COSMO, Moondrop PARA, Moondrop PARA 2, 4 more.

560 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the HiFiMAN HE400se: iFi Zen CAN has +22 dB of headroom there against +10 dB. 12 dB is about 16 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for iFi Zen CAN and Little Dot MK II because neither maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsiFi Zen CAN headroomLittle Dot MK II headroomiFi Zen CAN hissLittle Dot MK II hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+41 dB+28 dBnot publishednot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+21 dB+8 dBnot publishednot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+30 dB+22 dBnot publishednot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+26 dB+26 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+22 dB+10 dBnot publishednot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+19 dB+21 dBnot publishednot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+15 dB+17 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+13 dB+4 dBnot publishednot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The iFi Zen CAN costs $23 more than the Little Dot MK II. Out of the 567 models here, that difference buys 7 more models driven to 100 dB.

Nothing runs the other way: there is no axis here on which the cheaper of the two does better.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

Each in full: iFi Zen CAN and Little Dot MK II.

↑