JDS Labs Element III MK2 vs Topping DX5

Short answer

  • More power: the JDS Labs Element III MK2, with 2.30 W into 32 Ω; the Topping DX5 has 1.80 W. Both drive 567 of the 567 non-electrostatic headphones here to 100 dB, so on that test the difference changes nothing.
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — the maker of the Topping DX5 publishes no noise figure.
  • Output impedance: 4 headphones are left alone by the Topping DX5 under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the JDS Labs Element III MK2 (Campfire Audio Chimera, Moondrop Armature Art 12, Softears Volume, 1 more).
  • Price: the same, $449.

Both are desktop DAC/amps, both at $449.

On raw power they are level: each reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 non-electrostatic models here.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationJDS Labs Element III MK2Topping DX5
Power into 32Ω2.3 W1.8 W
Power into 150Ω584 mW433 mW
Power into 300Ω292 mW250 mW
Power into 600Ω146 mW125 mW
Output impedance0.7 Ω0.1 Ω
Output noise2.51 µVnot published
Price$449$449
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
567567

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadJDS Labs Element III MK2Topping DX5
32 ΩPublishedPublished
150 ΩPublishedDerived
300 ΩDerivedPublished
600 ΩPublishedDerived

Both makers publish a power rating. JDS Labs Element III MK2 publishes at 32 Ω, at 150 Ω and at 600 Ω; Topping DX5 at 32 Ω and at 300 Ω. The other rows are worked out from those.

So the two columns are not equally firm row by row: at 150 Ω and at 600 Ω only the JDS Labs Element III MK2 figure is the maker’s own and at 300 Ω only the Topping DX5 figure is the maker’s own. On those rows the derived number is the one to doubt first.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

On power they are interchangeable across this whole database: there is no headphone here that one reaches 100 dB on and the other does not.

4 headphones are left alone by the Topping DX5 under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the JDS Labs Element III MK2 (Campfire Audio Chimera, Moondrop Armature Art 12, Softears Volume, 1 more).

567 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Audeze LCD-2 Classic: JDS Labs Element III MK2 has +31 dB of headroom there against +30 dB. 1 dB is about 1.3 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for Topping DX5 because that maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsJDS Labs Element III MK2 headroomTopping DX5 headroomJDS Labs Element III MK2 hissTopping DX5 hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+42 dB+41 dB22 dBnot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+22 dB+21 dB2 dBnot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+31 dB+30 dB1 dBnot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+27 dB+27 dB-4 dBnot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+24 dB+22 dB-5 dBnot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+21 dB+20 dB-11 dBnot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+16 dB+16 dB-15 dBnot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+14 dB+13 dB-17 dBnot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

These two cost the same, $449, so price settles nothing. Out of the 567 models here, the Topping DX5 leaves 4 models alone under the one-eighth rule — and on the other side there is no such advantage at all.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

↑