JDS Labs Element IV vs Topping DX5

Short answer

More power: the JDS Labs Element IV, with 3.20 W into 32 Ω; the Topping DX5 has 1.80 W. Both drive 567 of the 567 non-electrostatic headphones here to 100 dB, so on that test the difference changes nothing.
Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — the maker of the Topping DX5 publishes no noise figure.
Output impedance: 15 headphones are left alone by the Topping DX5 under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the JDS Labs Element IV (64 Audio Nio, 64 Audio Volur, Campfire Audio Andromeda 2023, 12 more).
Price: the Topping DX5 costs $100 less, and wherever both makers publish a figure the JDS Labs Element IV shows no advantage for the extra money.

Both are desktop DAC/amps, $549 against $449.

On raw power they are level: each reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 non-electrostatic models here.

Every published figure, next to each other

Specification	JDS Labs Element IV	Topping DX5
Power into 32Ω	3.2 W	1.8 W
Power into 150Ω	692 mW	433 mW
Power into 300Ω	347 mW	250 mW
Power into 600Ω	174 mW	125 mW
Output impedance	1 Ω	0.1 Ω
Output noise	2 µV	not published
Price	$549	$449
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on out of 567	567	567

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

Where each power figure comes from

Load	JDS Labs Element IV	Topping DX5
32 Ω	Published	Published
150 Ω	Published	Derived
300 Ω	Derived	Published
600 Ω	Published	Derived

Both makers publish a power rating. JDS Labs Element IV publishes at 32 Ω, at 150 Ω and at 600 Ω; Topping DX5 at 32 Ω and at 300 Ω. The other rows are worked out from those.

So the two columns are not equally firm row by row: at 150 Ω and at 600 Ω only the JDS Labs Element IV figure is the maker’s own and at 300 Ω only the Topping DX5 figure is the maker’s own. On those rows the derived number is the one to doubt first.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

On power they are interchangeable across this whole database: there is no headphone here that one reaches 100 dB on and the other does not.

15 headphones are left alone by the Topping DX5 under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the JDS Labs Element IV (64 Audio Nio, 64 Audio Volur, Campfire Audio Andromeda 2023, 12 more).

567 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Campfire Audio Andromeda 2020: JDS Labs Element IV has +24 dB of headroom there against +21 dB. 2 dB is about 1.8 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for Topping DX5 because that maker publishes no output noise figure.

Headphone	Impedance	Needs	JDS Labs Element IV headroom	Topping DX5 headroom	JDS Labs Element IV hiss	Topping DX5 hiss
Shure SE846	9 Ω	0.04 mW	+44 dB	+41 dB	20 dB	not published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 2020	9 Ω	4.0 mW	+24 dB	+21 dB	0 dB	not published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic	70 Ω	0.79 mW	+33 dB	+30 dB	-1 dB	not published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)	250 Ω	0.63 mW	+28 dB	+27 dB	-6 dB	not published
HiFiMAN HE400se	25 Ω	7.9 mW	+25 dB	+22 dB	-7 dB	not published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X	470 Ω	1.6 mW	+21 dB	+20 dB	-13 dB	not published
Sennheiser HD 600	300 Ω	6.6 mW	+17 dB	+16 dB	-17 dB	not published
HiFiMAN Susvara	60 Ω	50 mW	+15 dB	+13 dB	-19 dB	not published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The JDS Labs Element IV costs $100 more than the Topping DX5, and on these three axes the money buys nothing: among the 567 models here there is not one that the JDS Labs Element IV handles and the Topping DX5 does not — not on power, not on the one-eighth rule, not on hiss. The traffic runs the other way: the cheaper Topping DX5 leaves 15 models alone under the one-eighth rule that the JDS Labs Element IV does not.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.