Luxury & Precision P6 Pro vs Shanling M9 Plus

Short answer

  • More power: the Shanling M9 Plus, with 520 mW into 32 Ω; the Luxury & Precision P6 Pro has 180 mW (balanced: 1.12 W against 700 mW). Both drive 566 of the 567 non-electrostatic headphones here to 100 dB, so on that test the difference changes nothing.
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — neither maker publishes a noise figure.
  • Output impedance: 15 headphones are left alone by the Luxury & Precision P6 Pro under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the Shanling M9 Plus (64 Audio Nio, 64 Audio Volur, Campfire Audio Andromeda 2023, 12 more).
  • Price: the Luxury & Precision P6 Pro costs $940 more; what that buys on these numbers is set out further down, under What the price difference buys.

Both are portable players, $3899 against $2959.

On raw power they are level: each reaches 100 dB on 566 of the 567 non-electrostatic models here.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationLuxury & Precision P6 ProShanling M9 Plus
Power into 32Ω180 mW520 mW
Power into 150Ω39 mW111 mW
Power into 300Ω20 mW55 mW
Power into 600Ω10.0 mW28 mW
Output impedance0.2 Ω1 Ω
Output noisenot publishednot published
Price$3899$2959
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
566566

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

The 4.4 mm or XLR socket, rated on its own

BalancedLuxury & Precision P6 ProShanling M9 Plus
Socket4.4mm4.4mm
Power into 32Ω700 mW1.1 W
Power into 300Ω80 mW120 mW derived
Output impedance0.4 Ω1 Ω
Output noisenot publishednot published
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
566567

Through the balanced sockets the Shanling M9 Plus reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here and the Luxury & Precision P6 Pro on 566. Derived figures are worked out from the loads the maker did publish.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadLuxury & Precision P6 ProShanling M9 Plus
32 ΩPublishedPublished
150 ΩDerivedDerived
300 ΩPublishedDerived
600 ΩDerivedDerived

Both makers publish a power rating. Luxury & Precision P6 Pro publishes at 32 Ω and at 300 Ω; Shanling M9 Plus at 32 Ω. The other rows are worked out from those.

So the two columns are not equally firm row by row: at 300 Ω only the Luxury & Precision P6 Pro figure is the maker’s own. On those rows the derived number is the one to doubt first.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

On power they are interchangeable across this whole database: there is no headphone here that one reaches 100 dB on and the other does not.

15 headphones are left alone by the Luxury & Precision P6 Pro under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the Shanling M9 Plus (64 Audio Nio, 64 Audio Volur, Campfire Audio Andromeda 2023, 12 more).

566 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the HiFiMAN Susvara: Shanling M9 Plus has +7 dB of headroom there against +3 dB. 5 dB is about 2.9 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for Luxury & Precision P6 Pro and Shanling M9 Plus because neither maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsLuxury & Precision P6 Pro headroomShanling M9 Plus headroomLuxury & Precision P6 Pro hissShanling M9 Plus hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+37 dB+36 dBnot publishednot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+17 dB+16 dBnot publishednot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+20 dB+25 dBnot publishednot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+16 dB+20 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+14 dB+17 dBnot publishednot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+9 dB+13 dBnot publishednot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+5 dB+9 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+3 dB+7 dBnot publishednot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The Luxury & Precision P6 Pro costs $940 more than the Shanling M9 Plus. Out of the 567 models here, that difference buys 15 more models left alone under the one-eighth rule.

Nothing runs the other way: there is no axis here on which the cheaper of the two does better.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

↑