M-Audio AIR 192|14 vs Roland BRIDGE CAST

Short answer

  • More power: the M-Audio AIR 192|14, with 160 mW into 32 Ω; the Roland BRIDGE CAST has 78 mW. The M-Audio AIR 192|14 drives 5 headphones to 100 dB that the Roland BRIDGE CAST cannot (Moondrop COSMO, Moondrop PARA 2, Moondrop VENUS, 2 more).
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — neither maker publishes a noise figure.
  • Price: the M-Audio AIR 192|14 costs $11 less, and wherever both makers publish a figure the Roland BRIDGE CAST shows no advantage for the extra money.

Both are audio interfaces, $329 against $340.

The M-Audio AIR 192|14 reaches 100 dB on 563 of the 567 models here, the Roland BRIDGE CAST on 558.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationM-Audio AIR 192|14Roland BRIDGE CAST
Power into 32Ω160 mW78 mW
Power into 150Ω34 mW36 mW
Power into 300Ω17 mW29 mW
Power into 600Ω8.5 mW15 mW
Output impedancenot published10 Ω
Output noisenot publishednot published
Price$329$340
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
563558

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadM-Audio AIR 192|14Roland BRIDGE CAST
32 ΩPublishedPublished
150 ΩDerivedDerived
300 ΩDerivedDerived
600 ΩDerivedDerived

Both makers publish a power rating. M-Audio AIR 192|14 publishes at 32 Ω; Roland BRIDGE CAST at 32 Ω. The other rows are worked out from those.

The two publish at the same loads, which is the one case where the rows of this table can be read straight across.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

5 headphones reach 100 dB on the M-Audio AIR 192|14 but not on the Roland BRIDGE CAST — Moondrop COSMO, Moondrop PARA 2, Moondrop VENUS, 2 more.

558 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the HiFiMAN HE400se: M-Audio AIR 192|14 has +12 dB of headroom there against +9 dB. 3 dB is about 2.1 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for M-Audio AIR 192|14 and Roland BRIDGE CAST because neither maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsM-Audio AIR 192|14 headroomRoland BRIDGE CAST headroomM-Audio AIR 192|14 hissRoland BRIDGE CAST hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+31 dB+27 dB dampingnot publishednot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+11 dB+7 dB dampingnot publishednot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+20 dB+18 dB dampingnot publishednot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+15 dB+17 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+12 dB+9 dB dampingnot publishednot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+8 dB+11 dBnot publishednot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+4 dB+6 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+2 dB+0 dB dampingnot publishednot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The Roland BRIDGE CAST costs $11 more than the M-Audio AIR 192|14, and on these three axes the money buys nothing: among the 567 models here there is not one that the Roland BRIDGE CAST handles and the M-Audio AIR 192|14 does not — not on power, not on the one-eighth rule, not on hiss. The traffic runs the other way: the cheaper M-Audio AIR 192|14 drives 5 models to 100 dB that the Roland BRIDGE CAST does not.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

↑