M-Audio AIR 192|14 vs Roland Rubix44

Both are audio interfaces, $329 against $432. This page puts them side by side on the only three things a maker can be held to — power, output impedance and noise — and then asks the question that actually matters: which headphones do they treat differently?

The M-Audio AIR 192|14 reaches 100 dB on 563 of the 567 models here, the Roland Rubix44 on 542.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationM-Audio AIR 192|14Roland Rubix44
Power into 32Ω160 mW19 mW
Power into 150Ω34 mW15 mW
Power into 300Ω17 mW9.4 mW
Power into 600Ω8.5 mW5.4 mW
Output impedancenot published47 Ω
Output noisenot publishednot published
Price$329$432
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
563542

A figure marked not published is missing from the maker’s own material, which is not the same as being good or bad. Where one of these two publishes a number and the other does not, the comparison on that axis cannot be made at all — and saying so is more useful than guessing.

The headphones that tell them apart

21 headphones reach 100 dB on the M-Audio AIR 192|14 but not on the Roland Rubix44 — Audeze LCD-5, Dan Clark Audio AEON 2 Closed, Dan Clark Audio AEON 2 Noire, 18 more.

542 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both. That is a power count and nothing more; whether either source suits a given headphone also depends on the two lines above.

Both pages in full

Each has a page of its own with every power figure traced to what the maker published and a full headphone list: M-Audio AIR 192|14 and Roland Rubix44. Or put either against your own headphones in the source comparison tool.