M-Audio AIR 192|14 vs Steinberg UR44C

Short answer

  • More power: the M-Audio AIR 192|14, with 160 mW into 32 Ω; the Steinberg UR44C has 80 mW. The M-Audio AIR 192|14 drives 5 headphones to 100 dB that the Steinberg UR44C cannot (Moondrop COSMO, Moondrop PARA 2, Moondrop VENUS, 2 more).
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — neither maker publishes a noise figure.
  • Price: the M-Audio AIR 192|14 costs $20 less, and wherever both makers publish a figure the Steinberg UR44C shows no advantage for the extra money.

Both are audio interfaces, $329 against $349.

The M-Audio AIR 192|14 reaches 100 dB on 563 of the 567 models here, the Steinberg UR44C on 558.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationM-Audio AIR 192|14Steinberg UR44C
Power into 32Ω160 mW80 mW
Power into 150Ω34 mW27 mW
Power into 300Ω17 mW13 mW
Power into 600Ω8.5 mW6.7 mW
Output impedancenot publishednot published
Output noisenot publishednot published
Price$329$349
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
563558

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadM-Audio AIR 192|14Steinberg UR44C
32 ΩPublishedDerived
150 ΩDerivedDerived
300 ΩDerivedDerived
600 ΩDerivedDerived

Only one of these two columns starts from a power rating. M-Audio AIR 192|14 publishes one at 32 Ω; Steinberg UR44C publishes none at any of these four loads, so its column is worked out from power it published at other loads. Both are arithmetic on a maker’s own figures rather than guesses, and the method used for the Steinberg UR44C understates rather than flatters — but at 32 Ω is the only load here at which its maker can be held to a figure.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

5 headphones reach 100 dB on the M-Audio AIR 192|14 but not on the Steinberg UR44C — Moondrop COSMO, Moondrop PARA 2, Moondrop VENUS, 2 more.

558 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the HiFiMAN HE400se: M-Audio AIR 192|14 has +12 dB of headroom there against +9 dB. 3 dB is twice the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for M-Audio AIR 192|14 and Steinberg UR44C because neither maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsM-Audio AIR 192|14 headroomSteinberg UR44C headroomM-Audio AIR 192|14 hissSteinberg UR44C hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+31 dB+28 dBnot publishednot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+11 dB+8 dBnot publishednot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+20 dB+19 dBnot publishednot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+15 dB+14 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+12 dB+9 dBnot publishednot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+8 dB+7 dBnot publishednot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+4 dB+3 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+2 dB+1 dBnot publishednot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The Steinberg UR44C costs $20 more than the M-Audio AIR 192|14, and on these three axes the money buys nothing: among the 567 models here there is not one that the Steinberg UR44C handles and the M-Audio AIR 192|14 does not — not on power, not on the one-eighth rule, not on hiss. The traffic runs the other way: the cheaper M-Audio AIR 192|14 drives 5 models to 100 dB that the Steinberg UR44C does not.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

↑