Matrix mini-i Pro 4 vs Violectric V226

Short answer

  • More power: the Violectric V226, with 2.20 W into 32 Ω; the Matrix mini-i Pro 4 has 1.16 W (balanced: 2.20 W against 2.13 W). Both drive 567 of the 567 non-electrostatic headphones here to 100 dB, so on that test the difference changes nothing.
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — the maker of the Matrix mini-i Pro 4 publishes no noise figure.
  • Output impedance: 520 headphones are left alone by the Violectric V226 under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the Matrix mini-i Pro 4 (64 Audio Aspire 1, 64 Audio Fourte, 64 Audio Nio, 517 more).
  • Price: the Violectric V226 costs $101 more; what that buys on these numbers is set out further down, under What the price difference buys.

Both are desktop DAC/amps, $1499 against $1600.

On raw power they are level: each reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 non-electrostatic models here.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationMatrix mini-i Pro 4Violectric V226
Power into 32Ω1.2 W2.2 W
Power into 150Ω366 mW2.6 W
Power into 300Ω260 mW1.8 W
Power into 600Ω130 mW900 mW
Output impedance11 Ω0.25 Ω
Output noisenot published6.15 µV
Price$1499$1600
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
567567

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

The 4.4 mm or XLR socket, rated on its own

BalancedMatrix mini-i Pro 4Violectric V226
Socket4.4mmbalanced
Power into 32Ω2.1 W derived2.2 W
Power into 300Ω950 mW1.8 W
Output impedance22 Ω0.5 Ω
Output noisenot published6.15 µV
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
567567

Through the balanced sockets the two are level on the same test: each reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here. Derived figures are worked out from the loads the maker did publish.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadMatrix mini-i Pro 4Violectric V226
32 ΩDerivedPublished
150 ΩDerivedDerived
300 ΩPublishedPublished
600 ΩPublishedPublished

Both makers publish a power rating. Matrix mini-i Pro 4 publishes at 300 Ω and at 600 Ω; Violectric V226 at 32 Ω, at 300 Ω and at 600 Ω. The other rows are worked out from those.

So the two columns are not equally firm row by row: at 32 Ω only the Violectric V226 figure is the maker’s own. On those rows the derived number is the one to doubt first.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

On power they are interchangeable across this whole database: there is no headphone here that one reaches 100 dB on and the other does not.

520 headphones are left alone by the Violectric V226 under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the Matrix mini-i Pro 4 (64 Audio Aspire 1, 64 Audio Fourte, 64 Audio Nio, 517 more).

567 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω): Violectric V226 has +35 dB of headroom there against +26 dB. 8 dB is about 7 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for Matrix mini-i Pro 4 because that maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsMatrix mini-i Pro 4 headroomViolectric V226 headroomMatrix mini-i Pro 4 hissViolectric V226 hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+39 dB damping+43 dBnot published30 dB
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+19 dB damping+23 dBnot published10 dB
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+29 dB damping+36 dBnot published8 dB
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+26 dB+35 dBnot published4 dB
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+21 dB damping+24 dBnot published3 dB
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+20 dB+29 dBnot published-3 dB
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+16 dB+24 dBnot published-7 dB
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+12 dB damping+18 dBnot published-9 dB

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The Violectric V226 costs $101 more than the Matrix mini-i Pro 4. Out of the 567 models here, that difference buys 520 more models left alone under the one-eighth rule.

Nothing runs the other way: there is no axis here on which the cheaper of the two does better.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

↑