Short answer
Both are audio interfaces, $149 against $199.
The PreSonus Studio 24c reaches 100 dB on 552 of the 567 models here, the Steinberg UR22C on 512.
| Specification | PreSonus Studio 24c | Steinberg UR22C |
|---|---|---|
| Power into 32Ω | 27 mW | 12 mW |
| Power into 150Ω | 18 mW | 4.0 mW |
| Power into 300Ω | 8.8 mW | 2.0 mW |
| Power into 600Ω | 4.4 mW | 1.0 mW |
| Output impedance | not published | not published |
| Output noise | not published | not published |
| Price | $149 | $199 |
| Headphones it reaches 100 dB on out of 567 | 552 | 512 |
Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.
| Load | PreSonus Studio 24c | Steinberg UR22C |
|---|---|---|
| 32 Ω | Derived | Derived |
| 150 Ω | Derived | Derived |
| 300 Ω | Derived | Derived |
| 600 Ω | Derived | Derived |
Neither column is a maker’s power rating at these loads. Of the 280 sources here, 209 publish a figure at at least one load; these two do not, so every row above is derived — between or beyond the loads each maker did publish, holding output voltage as the maker’s own figures imply. The method understates rather than flatters, but it is still arithmetic rather than a rating.
40 headphones reach 100 dB on the PreSonus Studio 24c but not on the Steinberg UR22C — AKG K612 Pro, Abyss AB-1266 Phi CC, Abyss AB-1266 Phi TC, 37 more.
512 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.
Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.
The widest gap on the list is the Sennheiser HD 600: PreSonus Studio 24c has +1 dB of headroom there against -5 dB. 6 dB is about 4.4 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.
The hiss columns are empty for PreSonus Studio 24c and Steinberg UR22C because neither maker publishes no output noise figure.
| Headphone | Impedance | Needs | PreSonus Studio 24c headroom | Steinberg UR22C headroom | PreSonus Studio 24c hiss | Steinberg UR22C hiss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shure SE846 | 9 Ω | 0.04 mW | +23 dB | +19 dB | not published | not published |
| Campfire Audio Andromeda 2020 | 9 Ω | 4.0 mW | +3 dB | -1 dB | not published | not published |
| Audeze LCD-2 Classic | 70 Ω | 0.79 mW | +17 dB | +10 dB | not published | not published |
| Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω) | 250 Ω | 0.63 mW | +12 dB | +6 dB | not published | not published |
| HiFiMAN HE400se | 25 Ω | 7.9 mW | +4 dB | +1 dB | not published | not published |
| Audio-Technica ATH-R70X | 470 Ω | 1.6 mW | +5 dB | -1 dB | not published | not published |
| Sennheiser HD 600 | 300 Ω | 6.6 mW | +1 dB | -5 dB | not published | not published |
| HiFiMAN Susvara | 60 Ω | 50 mW | -1 dB | -7 dB | not published | not published |
The Steinberg UR22C costs $50 more than the PreSonus Studio 24c, and on these three axes the money buys nothing: among the 567 models here there is not one that the Steinberg UR22C handles and the PreSonus Studio 24c does not — not on power, not on the one-eighth rule, not on hiss. The traffic runs the other way: the cheaper PreSonus Studio 24c drives 40 models to 100 dB that the Steinberg UR22C does not.
Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.
Each in full: PreSonus Studio 24c and Steinberg UR22C.