RME ADI-2 Pro FS R vs RME Fireface UCX II

Both are audio interfaces, $2199 against $1749. This page puts them side by side on the only three things a maker can be held to — power, output impedance and noise — and then asks the question that actually matters: which headphones do they treat differently?

The RME ADI-2 Pro FS R reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here, the RME Fireface UCX II on 564.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationRME ADI-2 Pro FS RRME Fireface UCX II
Power into 32Ω3.0 W210 mW
Power into 150Ω634 mW45 mW
Power into 300Ω317 mW22 mW
Power into 600Ω158 mW11 mW
Output impedance0.1 Ω1 Ω
Output noisenot publishednot published
Price$2199$1749
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
567564

A figure marked not published is missing from the maker’s own material, which is not the same as being good or bad. Where one of these two publishes a number and the other does not, the comparison on that axis cannot be made at all — and saying so is more useful than guessing.

The headphones that tell them apart

3 headphones reach 100 dB on the RME ADI-2 Pro FS R but not on the RME Fireface UCX II — Moondrop PARA, Symphonium Crimson, Symphonium Titan.

15 headphones are left alone by the RME ADI-2 Pro FS R under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the RME Fireface UCX II (64 Audio Nio, 64 Audio Volur, Campfire Audio Andromeda 2023, 12 more).

564 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both. That is a power count and nothing more; whether either source suits a given headphone also depends on the two lines above.

Both pages in full

Each has a page of its own with every power figure traced to what the maker published and a full headphone list: RME ADI-2 Pro FS R and RME Fireface UCX II. Or put either against your own headphones in the source comparison tool.