Roland BRIDGE CAST vs Roland Rubix22

Both are audio interfaces, $340 against $210. This page puts them side by side on the only three things a maker can be held to — power, output impedance and noise — and then asks the question that actually matters: which headphones do they treat differently?

The Roland BRIDGE CAST reaches 100 dB on 558 of the 567 models here, the Roland Rubix22 on 542.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationRoland BRIDGE CASTRoland Rubix22
Power into 32Ω78 mW19 mW
Power into 150Ω36 mW15 mW
Power into 300Ω29 mW9.4 mW
Power into 600Ω15 mW5.4 mW
Output impedance10 Ω47 Ω
Output noisenot publishednot published
Price$340$210
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
558542

A figure marked not published is missing from the maker’s own material, which is not the same as being good or bad. Where one of these two publishes a number and the other does not, the comparison on that axis cannot be made at all — and saying so is more useful than guessing.

The headphones that tell them apart

16 headphones reach 100 dB on the Roland BRIDGE CAST but not on the Roland Rubix22 — Audeze LCD-5, Dan Clark Audio AEON 2 Closed, Dan Clark Audio AEON 2 Noire, 13 more.

51 headphones are left alone by the Roland BRIDGE CAST under the one-eighth rule but coloured by the Roland Rubix22 (AKG K612 Pro, Audeze LCD-3, Audeze LCD-4, 48 more).

542 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both. That is a power count and nothing more; whether either source suits a given headphone also depends on the two lines above.

Both pages in full

Each has a page of its own with every power figure traced to what the maker published and a full headphone list: Roland BRIDGE CAST and Roland Rubix22. Or put either against your own headphones in the source comparison tool.

↑