Roland Rubix44 vs Steinberg UR44C

Short answer

  • More power: the Steinberg UR44C, with 80 mW into 32 Ω; the Roland Rubix44 has 19 mW. The Steinberg UR44C drives 16 headphones to 100 dB that the Roland Rubix44 cannot (Audeze LCD-5, Dan Clark Audio AEON 2 Closed, Dan Clark Audio AEON 2 Noire, 13 more).
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — neither maker publishes a noise figure.
  • Price: the Steinberg UR44C costs $83 less, and wherever both makers publish a figure the Roland Rubix44 shows no advantage for the extra money.

Both are audio interfaces, $432 against $349.

The Steinberg UR44C reaches 100 dB on 558 of the 567 models here, the Roland Rubix44 on 542.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationRoland Rubix44Steinberg UR44C
Power into 32Ω19 mW80 mW
Power into 150Ω15 mW27 mW
Power into 300Ω9.4 mW13 mW
Power into 600Ω5.4 mW6.7 mW
Output impedance47 Ωnot published
Output noisenot publishednot published
Price$432$349
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
542558

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadRoland Rubix44Steinberg UR44C
32 ΩDerivedDerived
150 ΩDerivedDerived
300 ΩDerivedDerived
600 ΩDerivedDerived

Neither column is a maker’s power rating at these loads. Of the 280 sources here, 209 publish a figure at at least one load; these two do not, so every row above is derived — between or beyond the loads each maker did publish, holding output voltage as the maker’s own figures imply. The method understates rather than flatters, but it is still arithmetic rather than a rating.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

16 headphones reach 100 dB on the Steinberg UR44C but not on the Roland Rubix44 — Audeze LCD-5, Dan Clark Audio AEON 2 Closed, Dan Clark Audio AEON 2 Noire, 13 more.

542 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Shure SE846: Steinberg UR44C has +28 dB of headroom there against +21 dB. 6 dB is about 4.1 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for Roland Rubix44 and Steinberg UR44C because neither maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsRoland Rubix44 headroomSteinberg UR44C headroomRoland Rubix44 hissSteinberg UR44C hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+21 dB damping+28 dBnot publishednot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+1 dB damping+8 dBnot publishednot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+13 dB damping+19 dBnot publishednot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+12 dB damping+14 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+3 dB damping+9 dBnot publishednot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+6 dB+7 dBnot publishednot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+2 dB damping+3 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW-4 dB damping+1 dBnot publishednot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The Roland Rubix44 costs $83 more than the Steinberg UR44C, and on these three axes the money buys nothing: among the 567 models here there is not one that the Roland Rubix44 handles and the Steinberg UR44C does not — not on power, not on the one-eighth rule, not on hiss. The traffic runs the other way: the cheaper Steinberg UR44C drives 16 models to 100 dB that the Roland Rubix44 does not.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

Each in full: Roland Rubix44 and Steinberg UR44C.

↑