Rupert Neve RNHP vs xDuoo TA-30

Short answer

  • More power: the xDuoo TA-30, with 3.00 W into 32 Ω; the Rupert Neve RNHP has 262 mW. The xDuoo TA-30 drives 1 headphone to 100 dB that the Rupert Neve RNHP cannot (Symphonium Titan).
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — the maker of the xDuoo TA-30 publishes no noise figure.
  • Price: the xDuoo TA-30 costs $10 more; what that buys on these numbers is set out further down, under What the price difference buys.

Both are desktop amplifiers, $699 against $709.

The xDuoo TA-30 reaches 100 dB on 567 of the 567 models here, the Rupert Neve RNHP on 566.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationRupert Neve RNHPxDuoo TA-30
Power into 32Ω262 mW3.0 W
Power into 150Ω175 mW640 mW
Power into 300Ω88 mW320 mW
Power into 600Ω44 mW160 mW
Output impedance0.08 Ωnot published
Output noise8.03 µVnot published
Price$699$709
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
566567

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadRupert Neve RNHPxDuoo TA-30
32 ΩDerivedPublished
150 ΩPublishedDerived
300 ΩDerivedDerived
600 ΩDerivedDerived

Both makers publish a power rating. Rupert Neve RNHP publishes at 150 Ω; xDuoo TA-30 at 32 Ω. The other rows are worked out from those.

So the two columns are not equally firm row by row: at 150 Ω only the Rupert Neve RNHP figure is the maker’s own and at 32 Ω only the xDuoo TA-30 figure is the maker’s own. On those rows the derived number is the one to doubt first.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

1 headphone reaches 100 dB on the xDuoo TA-30 but not on the Rupert Neve RNHP — Symphonium Titan.

566 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the HiFiMAN HE400se: xDuoo TA-30 has +25 dB of headroom there against +15 dB. 10 dB is about 9.6 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for xDuoo TA-30 because that maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsRupert Neve RNHP headroomxDuoo TA-30 headroomRupert Neve RNHP hissxDuoo TA-30 hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+35 dB+43 dB33 dBnot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+15 dB+23 dB13 dBnot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+25 dB+32 dB11 dBnot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+22 dB+28 dB6 dBnot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+15 dB+25 dB5 dBnot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+15 dB+21 dB-1 dBnot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+11 dB+17 dB-5 dBnot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+7 dB+15 dB-7 dBnot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The xDuoo TA-30 costs $10 more than the Rupert Neve RNHP. Out of the 567 models here, that difference buys 1 more model driven to 100 dB.

Nothing runs the other way: there is no axis here on which the cheaper of the two does better.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

Each in full: Rupert Neve RNHP and xDuoo TA-30.

↑