Loki Divine Mark vs Mimisbrunnr: which needs more amplifier?

The Kinera Loki Divine Mark is 14Ω at 105.0 dB (no reference unit printed); the Kinera Mimisbrunnr is 43Ω at 88.3 dB/mW. This page covers what they ask of an amplifier, not how they sound.

The Mimisbrunnr needs 16.7 dB more than the Loki Divine Mark to reach the same loudness — 15 mW against 0.32 mW.

The numbers that decide it

SpecificationLoki Divine MarkMimisbrunnr
Impedance14 Ω43 Ω
Sensitivity105.0 dB88.3 dB/mW
Sensitivity (voltage)123.5 dB/V102.0 dB/V
Power for 100 dB0.32 mW15 mW
Voltage for 100 dB67 mV0.80 V
Current for 100 dB4.8 mA18.5 mA
Highest source impedance
that leaves them alone (one-eighth rule)
1.75 Ω5.38 Ω
Sources that reach 100 dB
out of 280
280277

One caution before reading the rows. Kinera Loki Divine Mark printed a decibel figure with no reference unit, so this page reads it as per milliwatt. If it is really per volt, that model needs far more than the table says. Why the two readings differ by so much.

Where the two part company

3 of the 280 sources have the power for the Loki Divine Mark but not for the Mimisbrunnr — Apple USB-C dongle (EU), Steinberg UR22C, Sony NW-A306.

5 sources are low enough in output impedance for the Mimisbrunnr under the one-eighth rule but not for the Loki Divine Mark (Schiit Vali 2+, Astell&Kern HC3, Shanling H5, 2 more).

5 sources stay below the audible-hiss threshold with the Mimisbrunnr but cross it with the Loki Divine Mark (FiiO BTR11, FiiO K11 R2R, Lake People G111 Mk II, 2 more).

277 of the 280 sources here reach 100 dB on both.

What each one needs from 80 to 105 dB

The Mimisbrunnr is more demanding than 96% of the 567 non-electrostatic models in this database; the Loki Divine Mark than 20%.

dB SPLLoki Divine Mark powerLoki Divine Mark voltageMimisbrunnr powerMimisbrunnr voltage
803.2 µW7 mV0.15 mW80 mV
850.01 mW12 mV0.47 mW0.14 V
900.03 mW21 mV1.5 mW0.25 V
950.10 mW37 mV4.7 mW0.45 V
1000.32 mW67 mV15 mW0.80 V
1051.0 mW0.12 V47 mW1.42 V

The cheapest source that satisfies both

SourcePriceHeadroom, Loki Divine MarkHeadroom, MimisbrunnrOutput impedanceNoise
JadeAudio JA11$2016.2 dB1.8 dB0.5 Ω1.7 µV
FiiO KA11$2928.3 dB10.0 dB0.7 Ω1.7 µV
FiiO BTR13$5925.2 dB7.0 dB0.6 Ω1.0 µV

Of the 280 sources here, 277 reach 100 dB on both. 65 of them also publish an output impedance low enough for both under the one-eighth rule and a noise figure that stays below the audible-hiss threshold with both.

The cheapest of the 65 is the JadeAudio JA11, at $20. It leaves 16.2 dB of headroom on the Loki Divine Mark and 1.8 dB on the Mimisbrunnr, its output impedance is 0.5 Ω against a one-eighth limit of 1.75 Ω and 5.38 Ω, and its noise figure puts the hiss floor 12 dB and 33 dB below the 20 dB SPL this site treats as the point where a quiet room stops hiding it.

Try any other source.

What each sheet prints, and what it is worth

ModelAs printedToleranceStandard
Loki Divine Mark20Hz - 50kHz ultra-widebandnot printednot printed
Mimisbrunnr20Hz – 40kHznot printednot printed

Kinera prints 20Hz - 50kHz ultra-wideband for the Loki Divine Mark and 20Hz – 40kHz for the Mimisbrunnr.

Loki Divine Mark: Kinera prints “ultra-wideband” inside the specification cell, next to the numbers and in place of the tolerance that would have said what the range means.

Neither range has a tolerance printed beside it, so a wider range on one sheet is not deeper bass or more treble.

Not a measurement; maker by maker.

Both pages in full

Both have a page of their own. In full: Kinera Loki Divine Mark and Kinera Mimisbrunnr. Each figure on this page is labelled on those pages with where it came from, including the ones Kinera never published — what that maker publishes, counted.

↑