Creative Sound Blaster X5 vs iFi Zen DAC 3

Short answer

  • More power: the iFi Zen DAC 3, with 210 mW into 32 Ω; the Creative Sound Blaster X5 has 64 mW (balanced: 300 mW against 107 mW). The iFi Zen DAC 3 drives 3 headphones to 100 dB that the Creative Sound Blaster X5 cannot (Moondrop COSMO, Symphonium Helios, Symphonium Zenith).
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: cannot be compared — neither maker publishes a noise figure.
  • Price: the iFi Zen DAC 3 costs $56 less, and wherever both makers publish a figure the Creative Sound Blaster X5 shows no advantage for the extra money.

Both are desktop DAC/amps, $285 against $229.

The iFi Zen DAC 3 reaches 100 dB on 564 of the 567 models here, the Creative Sound Blaster X5 on 561.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationCreative Sound Blaster X5iFi Zen DAC 3
Power into 32Ω64 mW210 mW
Power into 150Ω112 mW50 mW
Power into 300Ω57 mW28 mW
Power into 600Ω29 mW18 mW
Output impedance1 Ω1 Ω
Output noisenot publishednot published
Price$285$229
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
561564

Not published means the maker leaves it out, so that axis cannot be compared.

The 4.4 mm or XLR socket, rated on its own

BalancedCreative Sound Blaster X5iFi Zen DAC 3
Socket4.4mm4.4mm
Power into 32Ω107 mW derived300 mW
Power into 300Ω214 mW derived106 mW derived
Output impedancenot published1 Ω
Output noisenot publishednot published
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
561565

Through the balanced sockets the iFi Zen DAC 3 reaches 100 dB on 565 of the 567 models here and the Creative Sound Blaster X5 on 561. Derived figures are worked out from the loads the maker did publish.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadCreative Sound Blaster X5iFi Zen DAC 3
32 ΩDerivedPublished
150 ΩPublishedDerived
300 ΩDerivedDerived
600 ΩPublishedPublished

Both makers publish a power rating. Creative Sound Blaster X5 publishes at 150 Ω and at 600 Ω; iFi Zen DAC 3 at 32 Ω and at 600 Ω. The other rows are worked out from those.

So the two columns are not equally firm row by row: at 150 Ω only the Creative Sound Blaster X5 figure is the maker’s own and at 32 Ω only the iFi Zen DAC 3 figure is the maker’s own. On those rows the derived number is the one to doubt first.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

3 headphones reach 100 dB on the iFi Zen DAC 3 but not on the Creative Sound Blaster X5 — Moondrop COSMO, Symphonium Helios, Symphonium Zenith.

561 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the HiFiMAN HE400se: iFi Zen DAC 3 has +13 dB of headroom there against +9 dB. 4 dB is about 2.7 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for Creative Sound Blaster X5 and iFi Zen DAC 3 because neither maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsCreative Sound Blaster X5 headroomiFi Zen DAC 3 headroomCreative Sound Blaster X5 hissiFi Zen DAC 3 hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+29 dB+32 dBnot publishednot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+9 dB+12 dBnot publishednot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+20 dB+21 dBnot publishednot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+20 dB+17 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+9 dB+13 dBnot publishednot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+14 dB+11 dBnot publishednot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+9 dB+6 dBnot publishednot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW+2 dB+4 dBnot publishednot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

The Creative Sound Blaster X5 costs $56 more than the iFi Zen DAC 3, and on these three axes the money buys nothing: among the 567 models here there is not one that the Creative Sound Blaster X5 handles and the iFi Zen DAC 3 does not — not on power, not on the one-eighth rule, not on hiss. The traffic runs the other way: the cheaper iFi Zen DAC 3 drives 3 models to 100 dB that the Creative Sound Blaster X5 does not.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

↑