FiiO BTR5 2021 vs Qudelix 5K

Short answer

  • More power: the Qudelix 5K, with 125 mW into 32 Ω; the FiiO BTR5 2021 has 80 mW (balanced: 500 mW against 240 mW). The FiiO BTR5 2021 drives 3 headphones to 100 dB that the Qudelix 5K cannot (Moondrop COSMO, Symphonium Helios, Symphonium Zenith). The Qudelix 5K drives 1 headphone to 100 dB that the FiiO BTR5 2021 cannot (HiFiMAN Susvara).
  • Hiss with sensitive IEMs: no headphone here hisses audibly on one and not on the other.
  • Price: the same, $109.

Both are Bluetooth receivers, both at $109.

The FiiO BTR5 2021 reaches 100 dB on 563 of the 567 models here, the Qudelix 5K on 561.

Every published figure, next to each other

SpecificationFiiO BTR5 2021Qudelix 5K
Power into 32Ω80 mW125 mW
Power into 150Ω17 mW27 mW
Power into 300Ω8.5 mW13 mW
Power into 600Ω4.3 mW6.7 mW
Output impedance1.0 Ω0.4 Ω unverified
Output noise2.0 µV3 µV unverified
Price$109$109
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
563561

The 4.4 mm or XLR socket, rated on its own

BalancedFiiO BTR5 2021Qudelix 5K
Socket2.5mm2.5mm
Power into 32Ω240 mW500 mW derived
Power into 300Ω26 mW derived53 mW derived
Output impedance2.0 Ωnot published
Output noise2.2 µVnot published
Headphones it reaches 100 dB on
out of 567
565566

Through the balanced sockets the Qudelix 5K reaches 100 dB on 566 of the 567 models here and the FiiO BTR5 2021 on 565. Derived figures are worked out from the loads the maker did publish.

Where each power figure comes from

LoadFiiO BTR5 2021Qudelix 5K
32 ΩPublishedUpper bound
150 ΩDerivedUpper bound
300 ΩDerivedUpper bound
600 ΩDerivedUpper bound

These two columns are not the same kind of number, and that matters more than the gap between them. FiiO BTR5 2021 publishes a power rating (at 32 Ω); Qudelix 5K publishes no power figure at any load, only a maximum output voltage, so every milliwatt in its column is a ceiling worked out from that voltage.

A ceiling assumes the amplifier holds that voltage into the load, and nothing on Qudelix 5K’s own sheet says it does. It is the most flattering reading available, and it is used here only because the alternative is a blank. Where the Qudelix 5K column looks the stronger of the two, treat the difference as unproven rather than measured. 24 of the 280 sources here are in that position, with no published power rating at any load.

What the labels mean.

The headphones that tell them apart

3 headphones reach 100 dB on the FiiO BTR5 2021 but not on the Qudelix 5K — Moondrop COSMO, Symphonium Helios, Symphonium Zenith.

1 headphone reaches 100 dB on the Qudelix 5K but not on the FiiO BTR5 2021 — HiFiMAN Susvara.

560 of the 567 models here reach 100 dB on both.

Headroom and hiss on 8 models, both sources

Headroom is at a 100 dB SPL peak.

The widest gap on the list is the Sennheiser HD 600: Qudelix 5K has +3 dB of headroom there against +1 dB. 2 dB is about 1.6 times the power, which matters for peaks rather than for how loud the music sits.

The hiss columns are empty for Qudelix 5K because that maker publishes no output noise figure.

HeadphoneImpedanceNeedsFiiO BTR5 2021 headroomQudelix 5K headroomFiiO BTR5 2021 hissQudelix 5K hiss
Shure SE8469 Ω0.04 mW+31 dB+29 dB20 dBnot published
Campfire Audio Andromeda 20209 Ω4.0 mW+11 dB+9 dB0 dBnot published
Audeze LCD-2 Classic70 Ω0.79 mW+17 dB+19 dB-1 dBnot published
Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro (250Ω)250 Ω0.63 mW+12 dB+14 dB-6 dBnot published
HiFiMAN HE400se25 Ω7.9 mW+10 dB+11 dB-7 dBnot published
Audio-Technica ATH-R70X470 Ω1.6 mW+5 dB+7 dB-13 dBnot published
Sennheiser HD 600300 Ω6.6 mW+1 dB+3 dB-17 dBnot published
HiFiMAN Susvara60 Ω50 mW-1 dB+1 dB-19 dBnot published

The gap in dollars, against the gap in numbers

These two cost the same, $109, so price settles nothing. Out of the 567 models here, the FiiO BTR5 2021 drives 3 models to 100 dB; the Qudelix 5K drives one model to 100 dB — and that is the whole of it on these three axes.

Only published figures count here; blank axes are counted separately.

Both pages in full

Each in full: FiiO BTR5 2021 and Qudelix 5K.

↑